Find Distance Covered by Point P on Parametric Curve: 0 to 9

  • Thread starter Thread starter ILoveBaseball
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curve Parametric
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the distance covered by a point on a parametric curve defined by the equations x(t) = t^2 + 30t - 11 and y(t) = t^2 + 30t + 38 between t=0 and t=9. The correct formula for the distance traveled is the integral of the square root of the sum of the squares of the derivatives, specifically ∫ from 0 to 9 of √((dx/dt)² + (dy/dt)²) dt. A participant initially set up an incorrect integral that calculated area instead of distance. The conversation clarifies the distinction between calculating area under the curve and the actual length of the curve. The correct approach was confirmed, leading to a successful calculation of the distance.
ILoveBaseball
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Consider the parametric curve given by the equations
x(t) = t^2+30t-11
y(t)=t^2+30t+38
How many units of distance are covered by the point P(t) = (x(t),y(t)) between t=0, and t=9 ?

well since the bounds are already given (0->9), i just need help on setting up the integral. here's what i done:

dx/dt = 2t+30

my integral:

\int_{0}^{9}(t^2+30t+38)*(2t+30)

but i get the incorrect answer when i integral it, can someone help me set it up?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ILoveBaseball said:
Consider the parametric curve given by the equations
x(t) = t^2+30t-11
y(t)=t^2+30t+38
How many units of distance are covered by the point P(t) = (x(t),y(t)) between t=0, and t=9 ?

well since the bounds are already given (0->9), i just need help on setting up the integral. here's what i done:

dx/dt = 2t+30

my integral:

\int_{0}^{9}(t^2+30t+38)*(2t+30)

but i get the incorrect answer when i integral it, can someone help me set it up?

The distance traveled is

\int_{0}^{9}\sqrt{(dx/dt)^2+(dy/dt)^2}dt

You either do this integral, or notice that the curve is a straight line.

ehild
 
What is the formula for calculating curve's length? You have calculated the area under the curve, not the length.
 
thank you, i got it correct
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K