Find equilibrium points given 2 differential equations

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around finding equilibrium points for a system of differential equations, specifically dx/dt = y(13 - x^2 - y^2) and dy/dt = 12 - x(13 - x^2 - y^2). The key approach involves setting both equations to zero, leading to potential solutions like y = 0 and x = ±sqrt(13). The confusion arises from interpreting the conditions under which these equations yield valid equilibrium points, particularly regarding the cubic term in the second equation. Ultimately, the correct equilibrium points identified are (12, 0), (sqrt(13), 0), and the roots from the second equation when y = 0, which are x = 1, 3, and -4. Understanding these relationships clarifies the classification of the equilibrium points in the system.
reality99
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given a system of differential equations and asked to find the equilibrium points and classify them.


Homework Equations



Equation 1 ... dx/dt=y(13-x^2-y^2 )
Equation 2 ... dy/dt=12-x(13-x^2-y^2 )


The Attempt at a Solution



I know the solution comes when the derivative is 0, so I set both equations to 0 and tried to solve from there. For equation 1, I get one of the solutions as y=0, x=N (assuming x+y=N). I also get x=+/- sqrt(13-y^2), y=sqrt(13/2). Is this correct for the first equation? I'm having trouble understand how to interpret these...

For equation 2 I am more confused since setting it to 0 ends up having a cubic term equal to a constant. My professor said it's similar to the first one and gave me something about if xyA=0 for the first equation then y(12-xA)=0 for equation 2... I don't really understand what this means/how to apply it. I can get the second equation to (x-1)(x-3)(x+4)+(x(y^2))=0 so if y=0 (which I believe is how the solution is supposed to work out, I just don't know why) then x=-4,1,3... Any help or explanation is greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first equation tells you 0=y*(13-x^2-y^2). That means either y=0 or (13-x^2-y^2)=0. If 13-x^2-y^2=0 can you have an equilibrium point? Look at the second equation.
 
So the system is inconsistent?
 
reality99 said:
So the system is inconsistent?

No. You have just ruled out the possibility that (13-x^2-y^2)=0 at an equilibrium point. There was another possibility suggested by the first equation, wasn't there?
 
Dick said:
No. You have just ruled out the possibility that (13-x^2-y^2)=0 at an equilibrium point. There was another possibility suggested by the first equation, wasn't there?

This gets more confusing the more I think about it... From the condition (13-x^2-y^2)=0, I got x=+/- sqrt(13-y^2), then plugging x back into (13-x^2-y^2)=0 means that y=0 and x=sqrt(13)?? Or am I going in circles?
 
Last edited:
reality99 said:
This gets more confusing the more I think about it... From the condition (13-x^2-y^2)=0, I got x=+/- sqrt(13-y^2), then plugging x back into (13-x^2-y^2)=0 means that y=0 and x=sqrt(13)??

(13-x^2-y^2)=0 doesn't give you an equilibrium point. The second equation told you that. So forget about it. The first equation also works if y=0. Pursue that possibility.
 
Ok, I don't know what I was doing before but I think I understand it now. Maybe.

[strike]If y=0, then x=12 or +/-sqrt(13)---> (12,0) and (sqrt(13),0)

another possibility if y=/=0 would be (x, +/-sqrt(13-x^2)) right?[/strike]

EDIT: (because I made a stupid mistake above)

y=0, x=1,3,-4

when y=0 the second equation is 12-x(13-y^2-x^2)=0 which is 12-x(13-x^2)=x^3-13x+12=(x-1)(x-3)(x+4) [I wrote it down wrong the first time I did it above, (12-x)(13-x^2)=/=12-x(13-x^2)...duh]
 
Last edited:
That's it.
 
Thanks so much for the help! I really appreciate it!
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
883
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K