Find Final Position of Skater 3 on Lake

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves three ice skaters on a frictionless lake who push off from each other, and the goal is to determine the final position of the third skater based on the positions of the first two skaters after they have moved. The subject area includes concepts from mechanics and center of mass calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using the center of mass equation to find the position of the third skater, with some attempting to break the problem into x and y components. Questions arise about the correctness of their approaches and the need to treat components separately.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, exploring different methods to calculate the position of skater #3. Some have provided guidance on breaking the problem into components, while others express confusion about their calculations and the implications of their assumptions.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the correct setup of the equations and the interpretation of the center of mass in relation to the positions of the skaters. Some participants mention discrepancies in their calculations and seek clarification on the approach.

anniecvc
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Three ice skaters are on a perfectly smooth frictionless lake. They are together at rest at the middle of the lake when they push off on each other. When skater #1 (m1 = 80 kg) is 6.00 meters EAST of the starting position, and skater #2 (m2 = 60 kg) is 6.00 meters NORTH of the starting position, how far away is skater #3 (m3 = 40) kg from the starting position?


My first intuition was to solve it this way:

Xcom = ((80kg)(6m)+(60kg)(6m) + (40kg)(X3))/180 kg

If I set Xcom to zero, X3 = 3m. Is it that simple?
However, I think I need to break it apart into components, but I'm still unclear about how to do this.

Please help!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


anniecvc said:
However, I think I need to break it apart into components, but I'm still unclear about how to do this.
Yes, treat the x (East) and y (North) components separately. What are the x and y components of the position of masses #1 and #2?
 


Xcom = ((80kg)(+6m) + [STRIKE](60kg)(0m)[/STRIKE] + (40kg)(X3))/180 kg

Ycom = ([STRIKE](80kg)(0m)[/STRIKE] + (60kg)(+6m) + (40kg)(X3))/180 kg

Where do I go from here?
 
Last edited:


anniecvc said:
Xcom = ((80kg)(+6m) + [STRIKE](60kg)(0m)[/STRIKE] + (40kg)(X3))/180 kg

Ycom = ([STRIKE](80kg)(0m)[/STRIKE] + (60kg)(+6m) + (40kg)(X3))/180 kg
Good.
Where do I go from here?

Also, I tried again by setting Xcom to zero (point of origin),
That's exactly what you're supposed to do.
and solving for it that way, got X=3m.
Show how you got that.
 


Doc,

I didn't find X3=3m by breaking it up into components. I found X3 by setting Xcom = 0 = ((80kg)(6m)+(60kg)(6m)+(40kg)(X3))/180kg in my original format and solving for it algebraically.

But if I break it into components and set Xcom and Ycom to zero:

Xcom=0= ((80kg)(6m) + 0 + (40kg)(X3))/180
I get..Xx3= -12 m

Ycom=0=((0 + (60kg)(6m) + (40kg)(X3))/180
I get..Xy3 = -9 m

I'm missing the point.
 


anniecvc said:
Doc,

I didn't find X3=3m by breaking it up into components. I found X3 by setting Xcom = 0 = ((80kg)(6m)+(60kg)(6m)+(40kg)(X3))/180kg in my original format and solving for it algebraically.
Your original approach is incorrect, since it mixes up the x and y coordinates.

But if I break it into components and set Xcom and Ycom to zero:

Xcom=0= ((80kg)(6m) + 0 + (40kg)(X3))/180
I get..Xx3= -12 m

Ycom=0=((0 + (60kg)(6m) + (40kg)(X3))/180
I get..Xy3 = -9 m
Good! You've just found the position coordinates of mass #3:

(X3, Y3) = (-12, -9)

I'm missing the point.
Use those coordinates to find its distance from the starting point.
 


Thank you very much Doc!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
27K