Find λ for Non-Uniform Scale & Shear Transformation

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
7 replies · 2K views
Appleton
Messages
91
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the two numerical values of λ such that

[itex] \left(\begin{array}{cc}4&3\\1&2\end{array}\right)<br /> \left(\begin{array}{cc}u\\1\end{array}\right)<br /> =λ<br /> \left(\begin{array}{cc}u\\1\end{array}\right)[/itex]

Hence or otherwise find the equations of the two lines through the origin which are invariant under the transformation of the plane defined by

[itex] \left(\begin{array}{cc}x\prime\\y\prime\end{array}\right)<br /> =<br /> \left(\begin{array}{cc}4&3\\1&2\end{array}\right)<br /> <br /> \left(\begin{array}{cc}x\\y\end{array}\right)[/itex]

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I believe [itex] \left(\begin{array}{cc}4&3\\1&2\end{array}\right)[/itex] represents a non uniform scale and shear. If λ is a numerical value it can only scale uniformly which suggests there is no solution to the initial equation. However, my textbook tells me the 2 numerical values are 5 and 1.

I skipped this first part of the question and found the two invariant lines by setting [itex]y=mx+c[/itex] equal to [itex]y\prime=mx\prime+c[/itex]. If someone could help me understand the first part of the question I would be very appreciative.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi App,

Can you write out the two equations that follow from the first matrix multiplication ? Eliminating ##\lambda## first seems the easiest to me; then the two values for u give the book values for ##\lambda##.
 
Appleton said:

Homework Statement


Find the two numerical values of λ such that

[itex] \left(\begin{array}{cc}4&3\\1&2\end{array}\right)<br /> \left(\begin{array}{cc}u\\1\end{array}\right)<br /> =λ<br /> \left(\begin{array}{cc}u\\1\end{array}\right)[/itex]

Hence or otherwise find the equations of the two lines through the origin which are invariant under the transformation of the plane defined by

[itex] \left(\begin{array}{cc}x\prime\\y\prime\end{array}\right)<br /> =<br /> \left(\begin{array}{cc}4&3\\1&2\end{array}\right)<br /> <br /> \left(\begin{array}{cc}x\\y\end{array}\right)[/itex]

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I believe [itex] \left(\begin{array}{cc}4&3\\1&2\end{array}\right)[/itex] represents a non uniform scale and shear. If λ is a numerical value it can only scale uniformly which suggests there is no solution to the initial equation. However, my textbook tells me the 2 numerical values are 5 and 1.

I skipped this first part of the question and found the two invariant lines by setting [itex]y=mx+c[/itex] equal to [itex]y\prime=mx\prime+c[/itex]. If someone could help me understand the first part of the question I would be very appreciative.

The question is asking you to find the eigenvalues ##\lambda_1, \lambda_2## of the matrix
[tex]A =\pmatrix{4&3\\1&2}[/tex]
and to show that the eigenvectors of ##A## have the form
[tex]\pmatrix{u\\1}[/tex]
See, eg., http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/DE/LA_Eigen.aspx .
 
The equation [itex]\begin{pmatrix}4 & 3 \\ 1 & 2 \end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix} u \\ 1 \end{pmatrix}= \lambda\begin{pmatrix} u \\ 1 \end{pmatrix}[/itex] is the same as the two equations [itex]4u+ 3= \lambda u[/itex] and [itex]u+ 2= \lambda[/itex]. That second equation is the same as [itex]u= \lambda- 2[/itex]. Replace u in the first equation with [itex]\lambda- 2[/itex] to get an equation in [itex]\lambda[/itex].
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for the help. I guess I wasn't taking into account the fact that u is not constant.

I am still having difficulty understanding how the 2nd part of the question follows from the first. My book has not yet explicitly introduced me to eigenvectors, so I am presuming that the connection can be deduced from very rudimentary matrix principles.
 
Appleton said:
Thanks for the help. I guess I wasn't taking into account the fact that u is not constant.

I am still having difficulty understanding how the 2nd part of the question follows from the first. My book has not yet explicitly introduced me to eigenvectors, so I am presuming that the connection can be deduced from very rudimentary matrix principles.

In fact, u is a constant---it is just the case that you don't know its value yet. Ditto for ##\lambda##.

Basically, you just need to write down the two equations in ##u## that you get from rows 1 and 2 of your matrix; then you have two equations in the single unknown ##u##. (The equations have an undetermined parameter ##\lambda## in them.) In order for these two equations to be consistent, the value (or values) of ##\lambda## must be special, and figuring out these special values is the crux of your problem.
 
Appleton said:
Thanks for the help. I guess I wasn't taking into account the fact that u is not constant.

I am still having difficulty understanding how the 2nd part of the question follows from the first. My book has not yet explicitly introduced me to eigenvectors, so I am presuming that the connection can be deduced from very rudimentary matrix principles.
Yes, it can, which should reinforce what an eigenvector is when it is formally defined.
 
I think I get it now. So the value of λ is superfluous for the second part of the question, it is only really u that we are concerned with at this stage, since u defines the vectors which, when multiplied by λ define the 2 invariant lines through the origin.

Thanks for all your help.