Find lcm(143, 227), lcm(306, 657), etc.? Can anyone verify my work?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math100
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the least common multiple (LCM) of pairs of integers using the formula lcm(a, b) = abs(a*b)/gcd(a, b). The calculations for lcm(143, 227) yielded 32461, lcm(306, 657) was initially stated as 33507 but corrected to 39618 after identifying that gcd(306, 657) is actually 9, not 6. Lastly, lcm(272, 1479) was correctly calculated as 23664 with gcd(272, 1479) being 17. The final results are confirmed as accurate.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Euclidean Algorithm for calculating GCD
  • Familiarity with the mathematical concepts of LCM and GCD
  • Basic multiplication and division skills
  • Ability to follow mathematical proofs and calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Euclidean Algorithm in detail for GCD calculations
  • Learn about the properties and applications of LCM in number theory
  • Explore error-checking techniques in mathematical proofs
  • Investigate the implications of GCD and LCM in programming algorithms
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, students studying number theory, and anyone interested in computational mathematics or algorithm design.

Math100
Messages
817
Reaction score
230
Homework Statement
Find lcm(143, 227), lcm(306, 657), and lcm(272, 1479).
Relevant Equations
None.
Proof: First, we will find lcm(143, 227).
Note that lcm(a, b)=abs(a*b)/[gcd(a, b)].
Now we will find gcd(143, 227).
Applying the Euclidean Algorithm produces:
227=1(143)+84
143=1(84)+59
84=1(59)+25
59=2(25)+9
25=2(9)+7
9=1(7)+2
7=3(2)+1
2=2(1)+0.
Thus, gcd(143, 227)=1.
Since gcd(143, 227)=1, it follows that lcm(143, 227)=abs(143*227)/[gcd(143, 227)]=32461.
Therefore, lcm(143, 227)=32461.
Next, we will find lcm(306, 657).
Note that lcm(a, b)=abs(a*b)/[gcd(a, b)].
Now we will find gcd(306, 657).
Applying the Euclidean Algorithm produces:
657=2(306)+42
306=7(42)+12
42=3(12)+6
12=2(6)+0.
Thus, gcd(306, 657)=6.
Since gcd(306, 657)=6, it follows that lcm(306, 657)=abs(306*657)/[gcd(306, 657)]=33507.
Therefore, lcm(306, 657)=33507.
Finally, we will find lcm(272, 1479).
Note that lcm(a, b)=abs(a*b)/[gcd(a, b)].
Now we will find gcd(272, 1479).
Applying the Euclidean Algorithm produces:
1479=5(272)+119
272=2(119)+34
119=3(34)+17
34=2(17)+0.
Thus, gcd(272, 1479)=17.
Since gcd(272, 1479)=17, it follows that lcm(272, 1479)=abs(272*1479)/[gcd(272, 1479)]=23664.
Therefore, lcm(272, 1479)=23664.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
phyzguy said:
gcd(306, 657) correct. The other two look good.
So everything is correct/looks good?
 
No.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Math100
gcd(306,657) is not 6.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Math100
Sorry, my first post was garbled.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Math100
I see now, I made mistakes for the second subproof. It should be the case that gcd(306, 657)=9. Am I right?
 
Yes
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Math100
Thank you so much for the help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
13K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K