MHB Find LU-Factorization of A with 1's Along Main Diagonal of L

  • Thread starter Thread starter skoker
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the LU-factorization of the matrix A with 1's along the main diagonal of L. The factorization process reveals that the matrix U is derived from modifying the second row of A, leading to a specific form of L and U. A key restriction identified is that the element a must be non-zero for the factorization to hold, ensuring A remains consistent and invertible. If a equals zero, a permutation matrix P can be used to facilitate the factorization. Overall, the LU-factorization can be achieved under these conditions, confirming that A can be expressed as the product of L and U.
skoker
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
find the LU-factorization of $A=\begin{bmatrix} a\ b\ \; \\ c\ d\ \; \end{bmatrix}$ that has 1's along the main diagonal of L.are there restrictions on the matrix A?\( A=\begin{bmatrix} \;a\ b\ \; \\ \;c\ d\ \; \end{bmatrix} \)

\( U=-\frac{c}{a}r_1+r_2\rightarrow r_2\begin{bmatrix} \;a\ b\ \; \\ \;0\ d-cb\ \; \end{bmatrix}
=\underset{E_1}{\begin{bmatrix} \;1\ 0\ \; \\ \;-\frac{c}{a}\ 1\ \; \end{bmatrix}}.\underset{A}{\begin{bmatrix} \;a\ b\ \; \\ \;c\ d\ \; \end{bmatrix}} \)

\( L=\underset{E^{-1}_1}{\begin{bmatrix} \;1\ 0\ \; \\ \;\frac{c}{a}\ 1\ \; \end{bmatrix}} \)

\( \therefore A=LU \)

first does this satisfy the the a=lu? also i am not sure the restrictions they are talking about? it seems to have no restrictions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The obvious restriction in that factorisation is that you must have $a\ne 0$.
 
that is true. i can not think of any of the matrix properties that would be a restriction with \( abcd \quad n \times n \). A is consistent and invertible. so i would not have any problems i think.
 
Last edited:
In general for $A\in\mathbb{R}^{n\times n}$ invertible we can get the factorization $PA=LU$ were $P$ is a permutation matrix. In our case, if $a=0$ then, $c\neq 0$ and you can choose $P=\begin{bmatrix}{0}&{1}\\{1}&{0}\end{bmatrix}$ .
 
Last edited:
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K