Find Matrix Representation of Green's Function | References

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Nourah
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix Representation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the matrix representation of Green's function, with participants expressing frustration over a lack of responses and discussing the clarity of the original question. The scope includes conceptual understanding and the formulation of mathematical problems.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests references for finding the matrix representation of Green's function.
  • Another participant suggests that the original poster may not have provided enough background or context for their question.
  • There is a discussion about the appropriateness of the original poster's tone and presentation, with some participants advising politeness and clarity in communication.
  • Participants note that the lack of grammatical structure may affect the appeal of the question.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the tone and clarity of the original question, but there is no consensus on the best approach to improve it or on the specifics of the matrix representation of Green's function.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights potential limitations in the clarity of the original question and the need for more structured information to facilitate responses.

Nourah
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
How can I find the matrix representation for Green's function.

If somebody have any reference please write it to me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why no body answer my Questions, Just viewing
 
Nourah said:
How can I find the matrix representation for Green's function.

If no one answers your question, it probably means that you didn't include
enough background or context in your question. Try including the
actual example (as latex math) that you wish to solve/understand.
(If you're not sure how to do latex here, there's some guidelines around,
or you can just click on someone else's math to get some info.)

Also, remember that other people here are not your personal servants.
Shouting in large red letters does not make them more willing to
help you. It's best to remain polite.
 
Why you are angrey, and it just for take attantion.

and if my question is not clear, and I had somebody wanted to answer my quaestion , I think they will asked for that.

Relay you are very polit, I think you are really stranger
.
 
Nourah said:
Why you are angrey, and it just for take attantion.
You should probably be asking yourself that.


Nourah said:
and if my question is not clear, and I had somebody wanted to answer my quaestion , I think they will asked for that.
That's what he did.

Nourah said:
Relay you are very polit, I think you are really stranger
He's not the one shouting at us in big red and purple letters. If I had answered your post before strangerep did, I would have said exactly the same thing he did. He was giving you some good advice. The big letters make it look like you're shouting. When a question isn't answered quickly, it's often because the guy who asked it (in this case you) hasn't made it easy enough for someone else to answer it. I can't guarantee that you will get a good answer if you provide more information, but it would certainly increase your chances.
 
Maybe the lack of grammatical structure is less appealing.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K