Find minimum number of generators for Z/nZ

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the minimum number of generators needed for the group ##\mathbb{Z}_n^*##, specifically for ##\mathbb{Z}_{100!}^*##. It highlights the complexity of determining these generators beyond simply checking orders and products of group elements. The Chinese remainder theorem is suggested as a method to decompose the group into cyclic components, leading to a proposed minimum of 25 generators. However, a conjecture is presented that 26 generators may be necessary to ensure that their intersection is only the identity element. The conversation concludes with uncertainty about the validity of this conjecture.
jackmell
Messages
1,806
Reaction score
54
Is there a method to find the minimum number of generators ##\big<a_1,a_2,\cdots,a_k\big>## needed to generate ##\mathbb{Z}_n^*## such that ##\mathop{\cap}\limits_{n=1}^k \big<a_n\big>=\{1\}## other than by just looking for them and checking orders and products of group elements?

For example, what would be the minimum generator set for ##\mathbb{Z}_{100!}^*##?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In your specific example, the best I can think of is the following. First prime decompose ##100!##:

100! = 2^{97} \cdot 3^{48}\cdot 5^{24}\cdot 7^{15}\cdot 11^9\cdot 13^7\cdot 17^5\cdot 19^5\cdot 23^4\cdot 29^3\cdot 31^3\cdot 37^2\cdot 41^2\cdot 43^2\cdot 47^2\cdot 53\cdot 59\cdot 61\cdot 67\cdot 71\cdot 73\cdot 79\cdot 83\cdot 89\cdot 97
By the Chinese remainder theorem, we have
\mathbb{Z}^*_{100!} \cong \mathbb{Z}^*_{2^{97}}\times \mathbb{Z}^*_{3^{48}}\times \mathbb{Z}^*_{5^{24}}\times \mathbb{Z}^*_{7^{15}}\times \mathbb{Z}^*_{11^9}\times \mathbb{Z}^*_{13^7}\times \mathbb{Z}^*_{17^5}\times \mathbb{Z}^*_{19^5}\times \mathbb{Z}^*_{23^4}\times \mathbb{Z}^*_{29^3}\times \mathbb{Z}^*_{31^3}\times \mathbb{Z}^*_{37^2}\times \mathbb{Z}^*_{41^2}\times \mathbb{Z}^*_{43^2}\times \mathbb{Z}^*_{47^2}\times \mathbb{Z}^*_{53}\times \mathbb{Z}^*_{59}\times \mathbb{Z}^*_{61}\times \mathbb{Z}^*_{67}\times \mathbb{Z}^*_{71}\times \mathbb{Z}^*_{73}\times \mathbb{Z}^*_{79}\times \mathbb{Z}^*_{83}\times \mathbb{Z}^*_{89}\times \mathbb{Z}^*_{97}
(If you want the concrete generators, then you will have to find this isomorphism which means you'll need to have an algorithm which implements the Chinese remainder theorem).
The multiplicative group of a cyclic group of prime power is ##\mathbb{Z}^*_{p^k}\cong \mathbb{Z}_{p^{k-1}(p-1)}## (see the above post to find the generators of such a group). So the above factors are all cyclic. So you can find a minimal (generally not minimum) set of generators of cardinality ##25##. Smaller sets might be possible.
 
  • Like
Likes jackmell
micromass said:
So you can find a minimal (generally not minimum) set of generators of cardinality ##25##. Smaller sets might be possible.

Ok, I understand how 25 would do but I suspect there is no set ##\big<a_1,a_2\cdots,a_{25}\big>## that would generate the group such that ##\mathop{\cap}\limits_{n=1}^{25} \big<a_n\big>=\{1\}##. I think we would need 26:

My conjecture:

Let ##\mathbb{Z}_{n}^*\cong S_2\times S_{p_2}\times\cdot \times S_{p_n}## where ##S_p## are the p-group expansions of ##\mathbb{Z}_n^*##. Then the minimal number of generators ##\big<a_1,a_2,\cdots,a_k\big>## for the group such that ##\mathop{\cap}\limits_{n=1}^{25} \big<a_n\big>=\{1\}## is equal to the number of factors of ##S_2##. In the case of ##\mathbb{Z}_{100!}^*##, it's 26.

I was wondering if there is any way we could prove or disprove that though?

Edit:

After thinking about this, I may be wrong since it seems to me the intersection of the 25 generators micormass proposed above would also be the identity element. Not sure.
 
Last edited:
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
843
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
866
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K