MHB Find Polynomial Roots: x4-2x3-25x2+50x

  • Thread starter Thread starter theakdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polynomial Roots
AI Thread Summary
The polynomial x^4 - 2x^3 - 25x^2 + 50x has been factored correctly into x(x - 5)(x + 5)(x - 2), revealing its roots. The roots identified are -5, 0, 2, and 5. The presence of the factor x indicates that 0 is indeed a root. The discussion clarifies that when x is isolated in front of other terms, it always contributes a root of zero. The method of equating each factor to zero confirms the solutions.
theakdad
Messages
210
Reaction score
0
I have to find all solutions for X when:
x4-2x3-25x2+50x

I have done it so,but I am not sure if this is ok:

x(x3-2x2-25x+50)

= x(x2(x-2)-25(x+2)
= x(x2-25)(x-2)
=x(x-5)(x+5)(x-2)

Now i see that root/zeroes are +5,-5 and 2. I know that this polynomial has another zero that is 0,but how do i know that? Because x is in the front? Or did i make a mistake and should such problems deal another way? Thank you for all replies!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
wishmaster said:
I have to find all solutions for X when:
x4-2x3-25x2+50x

I have done it so,but I am not sure if this is ok:

x(x3-2x2-25x+50)

= x(x2(x-2)-25(x-2))
= x(x2-25)(x-2)
=x(x-5)(x+5)(x-2)

Now i see that root/zeroes are +5,-5 and 2. I know that this polynomial has another zero that is 0,but how do i know that? Because x is in the front? Or did i make a mistake and should such problems deal another way? Thank you for all replies!

You had a minor typo in your working which did not affect the outcome. I have highlighted it in red, but is is obvious from your subsequent steps that you intended to write this. The four roots of the polynomial are found by equating each of the four factors to zero, including the factor $x$ in front, and solving for $x$. So you are correct that the four roots are (in ascending order):

$$x=-5,\,0,\,2,\,5$$

Great job! :D
 
MarkFL said:
You had a minor typo in your working which did not affect the outcome. I have highlighted it in red, but is is obvious from your subsequent steps that you intended to write this. The four roots of the polynomial are found by equating each of the four factors to zero, including the factor $x$ in front, and solving for $x$. So you are correct that the four roots are (in ascending order):

$$x=-5,\,0,\,2,\,5$$

Great job! :D

Thank you! Sorry,that was a type mismatch.
one question,when x stays alone in front of other terms,then this root is always zero?
 
wishmaster said:
Thank you! Sorry,that was a type mismatch.
one question,when x stays alone in front of other terms,then this root is always zero?

Yes, equating that factor to zero, we get:

$$x=0$$

It is already solved for $x$, and it tells us that $x=0$ is a root.
 
wishmaster said:
Thank you! Sorry,that was a type mismatch.
one question,when x stays alone in front of other terms,then this root is always zero?
Another way to se it if we want to divide by x Then we get 2 case
case 1 $$x=0$$
put $$x=0$$ to the equation and we see that $$0=0$$ hence 0 is a root
case 2 $$x \neq 0$$
we know can divide by x (we get third degree polynom) and now it's just to use rational root Theorem and long polynom division and Then it becomes second grade polynom which is easy to solve

Regards,
$$|\pi\rangle$$
 
wishmaster said:
x4-2x3-25x2+50x

=x(x-5)(x+5)(x-2)
To be specific we have that if ab = 0 then either a = 0 or b = 0. In this case that means when
x(x - 5)(x + 5)(x - 2) = 0

we get solutions when:
x = 0, or x - 5 = 0, or x + 5 = 0, or x - 2 = 0

The solutions to these four equations are your roots.

-Dan
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top