MHB Find Probability of Double Throwing 6-Sided Die 5 Times

  • Thread starter Thread starter Josefk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
Josefk
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
For throwing a 6-sided die 5 times, i’m trying to summate the following (only) possible outcomes to make 1.
a) all throws are different
b) two throws are the same (a double)
c) three throws are the same (a treble)
d) four throws are the same (a quartet)
e) all five throws are the same (quintet).

So far i have worked out that:

a) (1/6)^5 . 6!/5!1! = 1/1296
b) 6 . (1/6)^2 . (5/6)^3 . 5!/3!2! = 1250/1296
c) 6 . (1/6)^3 . (5/6)^2 . 5!/2!3! = 250/1296
d) 6. (1/6)^4 . (5/6)^1 . 5!/4!1! = 25/1296
e) 6 . (1/6)^5 = 1/1296

I summated the above, expecting them to come to 1, but they come to 1527/1296

I then realized that i was double counting some of the outcomes because when a treble is thrown there is a chance a double is ALSO thrown and when a double is thrown there is a chance that a treble is thrown, so to deduct these i did

i) chance of throwing a double given that a treble is thrown AND not throwing a quintet=
5 . (1/6)^2 = 5/36 = 180/1296
ii) chance if throwing a treble given that a double is thrown AND not throwing a quintet=
5 . (1/6)^3 = 5/216 = 30/1296

1527/1296 - 180/1296 - 30/1296 = 1317/1296

Can anyone tell me why this still doesn't come to 1?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Josefk said:
For throwing a 6-sided die 5 times, i’m trying to summate the following (only) possible outcomes to make 1.
a) all throws are different
b) two throws are the same (a double)
c) three throws are the same (a treble)
d) four throws are the same (a quartet)
e) all five throws are the same (quintet).

So far i have worked out that:

a) (1/6)^5 . 6!/5!1! = 1/1296
b) 6 . (1/6)^2 . (5/6)^3 . 5!/3!2! = 1250/1296
c) 6 . (1/6)^3 . (5/6)^2 . 5!/2!3! = 250/1296
d) 6. (1/6)^4 . (5/6)^1 . 5!/4!1! = 25/1296
e) 6 . (1/6)^5 = 1/1296

I summated the above, expecting them to come to 1, but they come to 1527/1296

I then realized that i was double counting some of the outcomes because when a treble is thrown there is a chance a double is ALSO thrown and when a double is thrown there is a chance that a treble is thrown, so to deduct these i did

i) chance of throwing a double given that a treble is thrown AND not throwing a quintet=
5 . (1/6)^2 = 5/36 = 180/1296
ii) chance if throwing a treble given that a double is thrown AND not throwing a quintet=
5 . (1/6)^3 = 5/216 = 30/1296

1527/1296 - 180/1296 - 30/1296 = 1317/1296

Can anyone tell me why this still doesn't come to 1?
I would use these possible outcomes:

a) all throws are different
b) two throws are the same (a double) and all the others are different
c) three throws are the same (a treble) and both the others are different
d) four throws are the same (a quartet) and the other one is different
e) all five throws are the same (quintet)
f) a double and a treble
g) two doubles and a single.

The probabilities are then

a) 120/1296
b) 600/1296
c) 200/1296
d) 25/1296
e) 1/1296
f) 50/1296
g) 300/1296.

Those add up to 1, as required.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top