Find Real Solutions to x4-2x3+kx2+px+36 = 0

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DragonMaths
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polynomial Roots
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the polynomial equation x4 - 2x3 + kx2 + px + 36 = 0, specifically focusing on finding real solutions and determining the values of k and p. The context includes algebraic manipulation, substitution of complex roots, and the implications of these roots on the coefficients of the polynomial.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant claims that x = 3i is a solution, implying that x = -3i is also a solution if all coefficients are real.
  • Another participant questions the sign of p, suggesting that substitution leads to a system of equations for k and p.
  • Several participants discuss the factorization of the polynomial using the known factor (x2 + 9) and propose a form for the polynomial that includes unknown coefficients a and b.
  • There is a suggestion to verify whether the remaining quadratic factor has real roots by examining its discriminant.
  • One participant expresses difficulty in using long division or synthetic division to find the coefficients, noting that both p and k appear in the remainder, complicating the solution.
  • Another participant points out that the remainder must be zero when dividing by a factor, leading to restrictions on p and k, and corrects the sign of p to -18.
  • There is a discussion about whether k and p are assumed to be real numbers, highlighting uncertainty in the problem statement.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the implications of the complex roots and the need to find values for k and p. However, there is disagreement regarding the correct sign of p and the assumptions about the coefficients being real numbers. The discussion remains unresolved as participants explore different approaches and interpretations.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the assumption that coefficients k and p are real numbers, which is not explicitly stated in the problem. Additionally, the mathematical steps involving the factorization and division processes are not fully resolved, leaving some uncertainty in the values of k and p.

DragonMaths
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
One of the solutions to
x4-2x3+kx2+px+36 = 0 is x = 3
i

Prove that this polynomial has no real solutions (roots) and find the real values of k and p.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So far the only progress I seem to have made was possibly finding the value of p.

Since x - 3i is a solution , we can say that x + 3i is also a solution.

I then proceeded to replacing x with 3i on one side, and then setting the solution to itself but with x as -3i , as follows :

x4-2x3+kx2+px+36 = x4-2x3+kx2+px+36
(3i)4-2(3i)3+k(3i)2+p(3i)+36 = (-3i)4-2(-3i)3+k(-3i)2+p(-3i)+36
81i4-54i3+9ki+3pi+36 = 81i4+54i3+9ki-3pi+36
0 = 108i3-6pi
0=-108i-6pi
0=-(108-6p)i
0=108-6p
6p=108
p=18

This is as much progress as I have made , and I cannot find anything that can help me
Keep in mind this is asked pre-calculus on on 11th grade Advanced Math course with university grade math problems and so on.Any help would be grately appreciated as I have no idea how to continue at this moment.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Are you sure about the sign of $p$?

Since $3i$ and $-3i$ have to satisfy the equation separately, substitution gives you a system of two independent linear equations in the two unknowns $p$ and $k$. As a starter, from this you can solve both $p$ and $k$.
 
DragonMaths said:
One of the solutions to
x4-2x3+kx2+px+36 = 0 is x = 3
i

Prove that this polynomial has no real solutions (roots) and find the values of k and p.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So far the only progress I seem to have made was possibly finding the value of p.

Since x - 3i is a solution , we can say that x + 3i is also a solution.

I then proceeded to replacing x with 3i on one side, and then setting the solution to itself but with x as -3i , as follows :

x4-2x3+kx2+px+36 = x4-2x3+kx2+px+36
(3i)4-2(3i)3+k(3i)2+p(3i)+36 = (-3i)4-2(-3i)3+k(-3i)2+p(-3i)+36
81i4-54i3+9ki+3pi+36 = 81i4+54i3+9ki-3pi+36
0 = 108i3-6pi
0=-108i-6pi
0=-(108-6p)i
0=108-6p
6p=108
p=18

This is as much progress as I have made , and I cannot find anything that can help me
Keep in mind this is asked pre-calculus on on 11th grade Advanced Math course with university grade math problems and so on.Any help would be grately appreciated as I have no idea how to continue at this moment.


Hi DragonMaths, welcome to MHB! (Wave)

Indeed, if $x=3i$ is a solution then $x=-3i$ is also a solution assuming that all coefficients are real numbers.
It means that we can factorize the polynomial.
And we can pick as a known factor $(x-3i)(x+3i)=(x^2+9)$.

So we can write the polynomial as:
$$(x^2+9)(x^2+ax+b) = x^4+ax^3+(b+9)x^2+9ax+9b$$

It follows that $a=-2,\ b+9=k,\ 9a=p,\ 9b=36$.
Can we find the constants from that?
Does the remaining $x^2+ax+b=0$ have any real roots? (Wondering)
 
Note that the (as usual correct!) post #3 gives you a way to obtain the quotient of the polynomial $p(x) = x^4 - 2x^3 + kx^2 + px + 36$ upon division by the known factor $m(x) = x^2 + 9$. Namely, it sets you up for solving a system of equations for the coefficients of $q$.

Another way to obtain $q$ is by long division of $p$ by $m$. I don't know if this is part of your pre-calculus course, but here it usually is, and it is a useful technique to know.
 
I like Serena said:
Hi DragonMaths, welcome to MHB! (Wave)

Indeed, if $x=3i$ is a solution then $x=-3i$ is also a solution assuming that all coefficients are real numbers.
It means that we can factorize the polynomial.
And we can pick as a known factor $(x-3i)(x+3i)=(x^2+9)$.

So we can write the polynomial as:
$$(x^2+9)(x^2+ax+b) = x^4+ax^3+(b+9)x^2+9ax+9b$$

It follows that $a=-2,\ b+9=k,\ 9a=p,\ 9b=36$.
Can we find the constants from that?
Does the remaining $x^2+ax+b=0$ have any real roots? (Wondering)

Firstly,thanks for welcoming me :) .Secondly , the question states that we have to prove all the factors are complex,which answers your question that the remaining $x^2+ax+b=0$ would not have any real roots as it is a factor.Thanks you for your contribution.
 
DragonMaths said:
Firstly,thanks for welcoming me :) .Secondly , the question states that we have to prove all the factors are complex,which answers your question that the remaining $x^2+ax+b=0$ would not have any real roots as it is a factor.Thanks you for your contribution.

Indeed, so we still need to find those values for a and b, and verify that the discriminant, which is $D=a^2-4b$ in this case, is negative, yielding complex solutions. (Nerd)
 
Krylov said:
Note that the (as usual correct!) post #3 gives you a way to obtain the quotient of the polynomial $p(x) = x^4 - 2x^3 + kx^2 + px + 36$ upon division by the known factor $m(x) = x^2 + 9$. Namely, it sets you up for solving a system of equations for the coefficients of $q$.

Another way to obtain $q$ is by long division of $p$ by $m$. I don't know if this is part of your pre-calculus course, but here it usually is, and it is a useful technique to know.

So I have tried using long division and synthetic division,but since we have to either divide using a complex number (which is not too much of a problem) or we use the known factor of $x^2 + 9$ ,but the unknown coefficients are still both present in the new polynomial created, namely being $x^2 -2x + k - 9$ with a remainder of $(p + 18)x - 9k +117$ which should be equal to 0 , as there should be no remainder when dividing by a factor.But as both $p$ and $k$ are present in the remainder , I'm stumped.
 
DragonMaths said:
So I have tried using long division and synthetic division,but since we have to either divide using a complex number (which is not too much of a problem) or we use the known factor of $x^2 + 9$ ,but the unknown coefficients are still both present in the new polynomial created, namely being $x^2 -2x + k - 9$ with a remainder of $(p + 18)x - 9k +117$ which should be equal to 0 , as there should be no remainder when dividing by a factor.But as both $p$ and $k$ are present in the remainder , I'm stumped.

Indeed. The remainder must be zero.
So that puts restrictions on p and k.
It means for starters that $p=-18$ (with the correct sign now, as Krylov pointed out).
Otherwise $3i$ and $-3i$ wouldn't be solutions.

Btw, is it given that k and p are real numbers?
As it is, that is not given in the problem statement.
And otherwise we cannot assume that $x=-3i$ is a solution.
 
I like Serena said:
Hi DragonMaths, welcome to MHB! (Wave)

Indeed, if $x=3i$ is a solution then $x=-3i$ is also a solution assuming that all coefficients are real numbers.
It means that we can factorize the polynomial.
And we can pick as a known factor $(x-3i)(x+3i)=(x^2+9)$.

So we can write the polynomial as:
$$(x^2+9)(x^2+ax+b) = x^4+ax^3+(b+9)x^2+9ax+9b$$

It follows that $a=-2,\ b+9=k,\ 9a=p,\ 9b=36$.
Can we find the constants from that?
Does the remaining $x^2+ax+b=0$ have any real roots? (Wondering)

Also , this is a great way to solve it and I did not even think that would so simple.It seems like a valid way to get the coefficients,and yet I've never seen someone do it in that way?

- - - Updated - - -

I like Serena said:
Indeed. The remainder must be zero.
So that puts restrictions on p and k.
It means for starters that $p=-18$ (with the correct sign now, as Krylov pointed out).
Otherwise $3i$ and $-3i$ wouldn't be solutions.

Btw, is it given that k and p are real numbers?
As it is, that is not given in the problem statement.
And otherwise we cannot assume that $x=-3i$ is a solution.

Just updated the original post thank you,the question does state that it is indeed a real number.
 
  • #10
DragonMaths said:
Also , this is a great way to solve it and I did not even think that would so simple.It seems like a valid way to get the coefficients, and yet I've never seen someone do it in that way?

It's just one of the many tricks of the trade.
A textbook may focus on explaining long division, and leave this approach out.
It's certainly easier to explain, and I've always preferred the simplest, most intuitive approach. ;)
 
  • #11
So after calculating and factorising a little it seems that $x^4 - 2x^3 + 13x^2 - 18x - 36 = 0$ is the solution to the problem , with $k = 13$ and $p = - 18$ for the coefficients , and the roots of the polynomial being equal to $(x + 3i)(x - 3i)(x - 1 + \sqrt{3}i)(x - 1 - \sqrt{3}i)$
 
  • #12
Yep. That's what I found as well. (Nod)
 
  • #13
Alternatively (and assuming $p$ and $k$ are real),

Substituting $3i$ and $-3i$ for $x$ in $f(x)=x^4-2x^3+kx^2+px+36$ we arrive at

$$81+54i-9k+3ip+36=0$$

and

$$81-54i-9k-3ip+36=0$$

Adding these two equations gives

$$162-18k+72=0\implies k=13$$

It can then be found that $p=-18.$

Now, if the other two roots were purely imaginary, $f(x)$ would have no odd powers of $x$ so we have

$$f(x)=(x^2+9)(x-(a+bi))(x-(a-bi))=(x^2+9)(x^2-(a+bi)x-(a-bi)x+(a+bi)(a-bi))=(x^2+9)(x^2-2ax+a^2+b^2)$$

Now, equating coefficients with $x^4-2x^3+13x^2-18x+36$, we have

$$9(a^2+b^2)=36\implies a^2+b^2=4$$

$$-2a=-2\implies a=1\Rightarrow b=\pm\sqrt3$$

The roots of $x^2-2x+4=0$ are $1\pm\sqrt3i$, as required.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K