Find Rydberg's Constant Using Graphical Method

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sintered
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant
Click For Summary
To determine Rydberg's constant using a graphical method for the Balmer series, the Rydberg formula can be rearranged into a linear form. The inverse wavelength (1/λ) is plotted on the Y-axis, while the expression (1/(nf)² - 1/(ni)²) is plotted on the X-axis, where nf is fixed at 2 and ni varies from 6 to 3. By plotting the data points derived from known wavelengths, a straight line can be fitted, and the slope of this line will yield the value of Rydberg's constant. Understanding the relationship between the variables is crucial for successfully applying this method. This approach effectively utilizes the graphical representation to solve for R.
Sintered
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Note: Questions is targeted at Balmer series only (ie, shell 6 --> 2 )

Given the Rydberg formula, 1/\lambda=R[1/(nf)2-1/(ni)2], describe a way of using a graphical method to determine the value of R.

Where nf=final shell (should always be 2 for Balmer series)
ni= initial shell (any shell from 6-->3)
\lambda=Wavelength
R=Rydberg's constant

Homework Equations



Umm, I gave it above.

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not sure...I understand the formula, I've done questions relating on the use of the formula, I have a good knowledge of the Balmer Series (as in Shell 3 --> 2 is given H\alpha, then 4-2 beta, etc), I know the empirical value of Rydberg's constant, but sadly I am completely stumped on how to do this. I'm pretty sure that this is done using gradients, but do not know what represents the Y and X values on the graph. Help will be much appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi sintered, welcome to PF.

The assumption here is that you have a bunch of wavelengths from the hydrogen emission spectrum. You also know the Rydberg formula, but you don't know the value of R.

Question 1: Can you match nf values with wavelengths?

Usually situations like this are approached by "linearizing" the equation, i.e. bringing the equation into the form

y = a x + b

and fitting a straight line through the data points. Look at the formula.

Question 2: Can you picture in your mind what could possibly y and x be?

Once you have that, it should be easy to see what a and b ought to be.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the welcome Kuru! I think I get it now =].

From the wavelengths provided the values of nf and ni can be deduced (probably from the provided info and knowledge of Balmer Series), and then if you let y=1/\lambda and x=1/(nf)2-1/(ni)2, then the value of X can be obtained and plotted on the X axis (?) with the corresponding value of the inverse wavelength on the Y axis (?). Rydberg's constant can then be obtained from the gradient.

I'm not sure if this is what you were hinting but its kind of making sense now. I won't ask you to provide everything in clarity, as this will be one of the topics in an upcoming assessment =D.
 
You are on the right track. Good luck with your upcoming assessment.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K