Find th Jordan canonical form of a matrix

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the Jordan canonical form of a 3x3 matrix with a characteristic polynomial of (1 + λ)³, indicating -1 as the sole eigenvalue with a multiplicity of 3. The matrix's Jordan form consists of two blocks: a 2x2 Jordan block and a separate 1x1 block, resulting in the final form: [[ -1, 0, 0 ], [ 0, -1, 0 ], [ 0, 1, -1 ]]. The diagonal entries are the eigenvalues, while the non-diagonal entries are determined by the structure of the Jordan blocks, specifically the number of independent eigenvectors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of eigenvalues and eigenvectors
  • Familiarity with Jordan canonical form
  • Knowledge of characteristic polynomials
  • Basic linear algebra concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Jordan blocks in linear algebra
  • Learn how to compute eigenvectors for matrices with repeated eigenvalues
  • Explore the relationship between minimal polynomials and Jordan forms
  • Practice deriving Jordan forms from various matrices
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying linear algebra, matrix theory, or anyone involved in advanced mathematical computations requiring an understanding of Jordan canonical forms.

Antti
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
I've followed and understood this small example of calculating jordan forms all the way to the last line where they say "Therefore, the jordan form is...". When they say "therefore", it's NEVER obvious :smile:

Anyway, I get why the diagonal entries are -1. And that a minimal polynomial (t+1)^2 means I have two Jordan blocks with dimensions 1 and 2. But why is (3,2) in the final answer one? Or perhaps I should ask: how do you know what "non-diagonal" numbers to put where, when you get to this point of the calculation. Thanks in advance!

http://www.math.umn.edu/~jpeters/Prelims/F96/Problem5.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
When you mean by "the diagonal entries are -1", you mean for this particular problem, which you hadn't shown us yet. The diagonal entries are the eigenvalues of the matrix which may or may not be "-1". By the way, some texts define the Jordan Normal Form to have "1"s above the diagonal, not below. In the url you give, the Jordan normal form for a matrix consists of "blocks" in which the diagonal numbers are the same number- an eigenvalue, and the numbers must below the diagonal are 1. Such a single block might be
\left[\begin{matrix} \lambda & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 1 & \lambda & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & \lambda & 0 \\0 & 0 & 1 & \lambda\end{array}\right]

A general "Jordan form" might consist of a number of those: if a 4 by 4 matrix has eigenvalues 2 and 3, each of multiplicity 2, then its Jordan form might be
\left[\begin{matrix} 2 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 1 & 2 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 3 & 0\\0 & 0 & 1 & 3 \end{array}\right]

A complicating factor is that the same eigenvalue may give rise to more than one "Jordan block" depending on how many independent eigenvecotrs it has.

The particular matrix given here is 3 by 3 but its characteristic polynomial is (1+ \lambda)^3 so it has only -1 as an eigenvalue, of multiplicity 3. In order to determine whether this matrix is diagonalizable, or how many "Jordan blocks" it has, we must determine the corresponding eigenvectors. It turns out that any eigenvector <x, y, z> must satisfy x+ 2y-5z so any eigenvector is a linear combination of <-2, 1, 0> and <-5, 0, 1>. That means that the eigenspace is of dimension 2 so there will be a 2 by 2 "Jordan block" and a single separate eigenvalue:
\left[\begin{matrix} -1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; -1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; 1 &amp; -1 &amp; 0 \\0 &amp; 0 &amp; 1 &amp; -1 \end{array}\right]
Where the separate eigenvalue -1 is in the first row and the rest is the "Jordan block".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K