maxkor
- 79
- 0
I've tried:
BC || EF
How to find angle GDC? I think GDC=7x but why?
I have an answer but how to solve this?
Last edited:
The discussion revolves around finding the angle GDC in a triangle involving various angles expressed in terms of a variable x. Participants explore different approaches to derive relationships between the angles, including the use of isosceles triangle properties and the law of sines. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and problem-solving techniques related to geometry.
Participants express differing views on the relationships between the angles and the correctness of their calculations. There is no consensus on the best approach to solve for angle GDC, and multiple competing views remain throughout the discussion.
Participants acknowledge potential typos and misinterpretations in their calculations, leading to confusion about angle sums. The discussion includes various assumptions about angle relationships that are not fully resolved.
Readers interested in geometric problem-solving, angle relationships in triangles, and mathematical reasoning may find this discussion valuable.
There's another approach. Look at angle BAC. It's 180 - 7x - 7x. (ABC is isosceles, but we don't need this.) So we can get angle DAC in terms of x.maxkor said:https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/11871
View attachment 11873
I've tried:
BC || EF
How to find angle GDC? I think GDC=7x but why?
I have an answer but how to solve this?
Sorry, that was a typo. They sum to 360. Notice that all three angles sum to form a circle.maxkor said:ok, BAC = 180 - 14x
Can you tel why ADB + BDC + ADC= 180? I don't see it.
Well, it made a lot more sense when I had the typo! :)maxkor said:ADB=180-3x
BDC=180-8x
ADC=11x
ADB + BDC + ADC=180-3x+180-8x+11x=360
And what next??
Interesting, Wolfram confirms that $x=10^\circ$ is also a solution of the same equation. It appears that I misinterpreted the output of Wolfram.maxkor said:Ok but answer is 10 not 0, so how solve this without wolfram.
I've tried to find a trick solution.
There doesn't seem to be a problem 1469 in there:maxkor said:This is the problem with the 4 point kangaroo competition.
maxkor said:I've tried to find a trick solution.
$\triangle CGD$ is not also isosceles.Klaas van Aarsen said:If only we could prove that $\triangle CGD$ is similar to $\triangle AGC$.
We have 1 angle that is the same.
We either need another angle, or we need to prove $\triangle CGD$ is also isosceles.