maxkor
- 79
- 0
I've tried:
BC || EF
How to find angle GDC? I think GDC=7x but why?
I have an answer but how to solve this?
Last edited:
The discussion focuses on solving for angle GDC in a triangle where BC is parallel to EF. The angles are expressed in terms of x, specifically GDC=7x, and through various calculations, it is established that angle BAC equals 180 - 14x. The participants derive that angles ADB, BDC, and ADC sum to 360 degrees, leading to the conclusion that x=10 degrees is the only valid solution for the triangle's angles to remain less than 180 degrees. This solution is confirmed through the law of sines and geometric reasoning.
PREREQUISITESMathematicians, geometry enthusiasts, and students preparing for competitive exams who are interested in solving triangle-related problems and understanding angle relationships.
There's another approach. Look at angle BAC. It's 180 - 7x - 7x. (ABC is isosceles, but we don't need this.) So we can get angle DAC in terms of x.maxkor said:https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/11871
View attachment 11873
I've tried:
BC || EF
How to find angle GDC? I think GDC=7x but why?
I have an answer but how to solve this?
Sorry, that was a typo. They sum to 360. Notice that all three angles sum to form a circle.maxkor said:ok, BAC = 180 - 14x
Can you tel why ADB + BDC + ADC= 180? I don't see it.
Well, it made a lot more sense when I had the typo! :)maxkor said:ADB=180-3x
BDC=180-8x
ADC=11x
ADB + BDC + ADC=180-3x+180-8x+11x=360
And what next??
Interesting, Wolfram confirms that $x=10^\circ$ is also a solution of the same equation. It appears that I misinterpreted the output of Wolfram.maxkor said:Ok but answer is 10 not 0, so how solve this without wolfram.
I've tried to find a trick solution.
There doesn't seem to be a problem 1469 in there:maxkor said:This is the problem with the 4 point kangaroo competition.
maxkor said:I've tried to find a trick solution.
$\triangle CGD$ is not also isosceles.Klaas van Aarsen said:If only we could prove that $\triangle CGD$ is similar to $\triangle AGC$.
We have 1 angle that is the same.
We either need another angle, or we need to prove $\triangle CGD$ is also isosceles.