Find the diameter of one circle

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circle Diameter
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the diameter of one circle in a configuration of five identical semicircles. Participants explore different methods to approach the problem, including non-algebraic techniques and visual representations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the sums of the gaps above and below the semicircles are 24 and 60, respectively, leading to a diameter of 36 based on the difference.
  • Another participant expresses concern that this method still counts as algebraic and prefers to wait before sharing their own non-algebraic solution.
  • A later reply acknowledges the previous participant's method as correct and presents an alternative diagram and approach to illustrate the problem differently.
  • The final calculation presented sums various segments to conclude that the diameter equals 36.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the methods used, with some viewing certain approaches as algebraic while others do not. Multiple perspectives on how to solve the problem remain evident.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the configuration and measurements may not be explicitly stated, and the discussion involves different interpretations of what constitutes an algebraic method.

anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Five identical semicircles are arranged as shown. Find the diameter of one circle.
[TIKZ]
\draw (0,0) -- (16.5, 0);
\begin{scope}
\clip (0,0) rectangle (4.5,4.5);
\draw (2.25,0) circle(2.25);
\draw (0,0) -- (4.5,0);
\end{scope}
\begin{scope}
\clip (6,0) rectangle (10.5,4.5);
\draw (8.25,0) circle(2.25);
\draw (6,0) -- (10.5,0);
\end{scope}
\begin{scope}
\clip (12,0) rectangle (16.5,4.5);
\draw (14.25,0) circle(2.25);
\draw (12,0) -- (16.5,0);
\end{scope}
\begin{scope}
\clip (2.75,0) rectangle (7.25,-4.5);
\draw (5,0) circle(2.25);
\draw (2.75,0) -- (7.25,0);
\end{scope}
\begin{scope}
\clip (9.25,0) rectangle (13.75,-4.5);
\draw (11.5,0) circle(2.25);
\draw (9.25,0) -- (13.75,0);
\end{scope}
\draw [<->] (4.5, 0.5) -- (6, 0.5);
\draw [<->] (10.5, 0.5) -- (12, 0.5);
\draw [<->] (0, -0.5) -- (2.75, -0.5);
\draw [<->] (7.25, -0.5) -- (9.25, -0.5);
\draw [<->] (13.75, -0.5) -- (16.5, -0.5);
\coordinate[label=left:12] (A) at (5.5,0.8);
\coordinate[label=left:12] (B) at (11.5,0.8);
\coordinate[label=left:22] (C) at (1.6,-0.8);
\coordinate[label=left:16] (D) at (8.6,-0.8);
\coordinate[label=left:22] (D) at (15.6,-0.8);
[/TIKZ]

As this is a Singapore primary math problem, it is understandable that one can solve it without the use of algebra method (form an equation and solve the equation is what I mean by algebra method). I enjoyed this problem quite a bit, therefore I wanted to post it here to let others to try to solve it without the use of algebra method...:)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would say that the sums of the gaps are 24 (above) and 60 (below). As there is one more semicircle above, its diameter is equal to the difference 36.
 
Thanks castor28 for your reply!

But, I still count that as an algebra method, hehehe...I will let others have a chance to take a stab at it before I post the so called without-algebra solution. Please stay tuned! :)
 
Hi castor28!

I don't know where my head was when I made the previous reply (Tmi) , I'm so sorry!(Sadface) Your answer is spot on!

Here is a diagram to illustrate a slightly different approach than castors28's method:

[TIKZ]
\draw (0,0) -- (16.5, 0);
\begin{scope}
\clip (0,0) rectangle (4.5,4.5);
\draw (2.25,0) circle(2.25);
\draw (0,0) -- (4.5,0);
\end{scope}
\begin{scope}
\clip (6,0) rectangle (10.5,4.5);
\draw (8.25,0) circle(2.25);
\draw (6,0) -- (10.5,0);
\end{scope}
\begin{scope}
\clip (12,0) rectangle (16.5,4.5);
\draw (14.25,0) circle(2.25);
\draw (12,0) -- (16.5,0);
\end{scope}
\begin{scope}
\clip (0,0) rectangle (4.5,-4.5);
\draw (2.25,0) circle(2.25);
\draw (0,0) -- (4.5,0);
\end{scope}
\begin{scope}
\clip (12,0) rectangle (16.5,-4.5);
\draw (14.25,0) circle(2.25);
\draw (12,0) -- (16.5,0);
\end{scope}
\draw [<->] (4.5, 0.5) -- (6, 0.5);
\draw [<->] (10.5, 0.5) -- (12, 0.5);
\draw [<->] (4.5, -0.5) -- (6, -0.5);
\draw [<->] (7.25, -0.5) -- (9.25, -0.5);
\draw [<->] (10.5, -0.5) -- (12, -0.5);
\draw [<->] (6, -0.5) -- (7.25, -0.5);
\draw [<->] (9.25, -0.5) -- (10.5, -0.5);
\coordinate[label=left:12] (A) at (5.5,0.8);
\coordinate[label=left:12] (B) at (11.5,0.8);
\coordinate[label=left:12] (C) at (5.5,-0.8);
\coordinate[label=left:16] (D) at (8.6,-0.8);
\coordinate[label=left:12] (D) at (11.5,-0.8);
\coordinate[label=left:10] (E) at (6.9,-0.8);
\coordinate[label=left:10] (F) at (10.1,-0.8);
[/TIKZ]

$\therefore \text{diameter}=10+16+10=36$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K