MHB Find the diameter of one circle

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circle Diameter
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Five identical semicircles are arranged as shown. Find the diameter of one circle.
[TIKZ]
\draw (0,0) -- (16.5, 0);
\begin{scope}
\clip (0,0) rectangle (4.5,4.5);
\draw (2.25,0) circle(2.25);
\draw (0,0) -- (4.5,0);
\end{scope}
\begin{scope}
\clip (6,0) rectangle (10.5,4.5);
\draw (8.25,0) circle(2.25);
\draw (6,0) -- (10.5,0);
\end{scope}
\begin{scope}
\clip (12,0) rectangle (16.5,4.5);
\draw (14.25,0) circle(2.25);
\draw (12,0) -- (16.5,0);
\end{scope}
\begin{scope}
\clip (2.75,0) rectangle (7.25,-4.5);
\draw (5,0) circle(2.25);
\draw (2.75,0) -- (7.25,0);
\end{scope}
\begin{scope}
\clip (9.25,0) rectangle (13.75,-4.5);
\draw (11.5,0) circle(2.25);
\draw (9.25,0) -- (13.75,0);
\end{scope}
\draw [<->] (4.5, 0.5) -- (6, 0.5);
\draw [<->] (10.5, 0.5) -- (12, 0.5);
\draw [<->] (0, -0.5) -- (2.75, -0.5);
\draw [<->] (7.25, -0.5) -- (9.25, -0.5);
\draw [<->] (13.75, -0.5) -- (16.5, -0.5);
\coordinate[label=left:12] (A) at (5.5,0.8);
\coordinate[label=left:12] (B) at (11.5,0.8);
\coordinate[label=left:22] (C) at (1.6,-0.8);
\coordinate[label=left:16] (D) at (8.6,-0.8);
\coordinate[label=left:22] (D) at (15.6,-0.8);
[/TIKZ]

As this is a Singapore primary math problem, it is understandable that one can solve it without the use of algebra method (form an equation and solve the equation is what I mean by algebra method). I enjoyed this problem quite a bit, therefore I wanted to post it here to let others to try to solve it without the use of algebra method...:)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would say that the sums of the gaps are 24 (above) and 60 (below). As there is one more semicircle above, its diameter is equal to the difference 36.
 
Thanks castor28 for your reply!

But, I still count that as an algebra method, hehehe...I will let others have a chance to take a stab at it before I post the so called without-algebra solution. Please stay tuned! :)
 
Hi castor28!

I don't know where my head was when I made the previous reply (Tmi) , I'm so sorry!(Sadface) Your answer is spot on!

Here is a diagram to illustrate a slightly different approach than castors28's method:

[TIKZ]
\draw (0,0) -- (16.5, 0);
\begin{scope}
\clip (0,0) rectangle (4.5,4.5);
\draw (2.25,0) circle(2.25);
\draw (0,0) -- (4.5,0);
\end{scope}
\begin{scope}
\clip (6,0) rectangle (10.5,4.5);
\draw (8.25,0) circle(2.25);
\draw (6,0) -- (10.5,0);
\end{scope}
\begin{scope}
\clip (12,0) rectangle (16.5,4.5);
\draw (14.25,0) circle(2.25);
\draw (12,0) -- (16.5,0);
\end{scope}
\begin{scope}
\clip (0,0) rectangle (4.5,-4.5);
\draw (2.25,0) circle(2.25);
\draw (0,0) -- (4.5,0);
\end{scope}
\begin{scope}
\clip (12,0) rectangle (16.5,-4.5);
\draw (14.25,0) circle(2.25);
\draw (12,0) -- (16.5,0);
\end{scope}
\draw [<->] (4.5, 0.5) -- (6, 0.5);
\draw [<->] (10.5, 0.5) -- (12, 0.5);
\draw [<->] (4.5, -0.5) -- (6, -0.5);
\draw [<->] (7.25, -0.5) -- (9.25, -0.5);
\draw [<->] (10.5, -0.5) -- (12, -0.5);
\draw [<->] (6, -0.5) -- (7.25, -0.5);
\draw [<->] (9.25, -0.5) -- (10.5, -0.5);
\coordinate[label=left:12] (A) at (5.5,0.8);
\coordinate[label=left:12] (B) at (11.5,0.8);
\coordinate[label=left:12] (C) at (5.5,-0.8);
\coordinate[label=left:16] (D) at (8.6,-0.8);
\coordinate[label=left:12] (D) at (11.5,-0.8);
\coordinate[label=left:10] (E) at (6.9,-0.8);
\coordinate[label=left:10] (F) at (10.1,-0.8);
[/TIKZ]

$\therefore \text{diameter}=10+16+10=36$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top