Find the energy which was released when the 'Death Star' was destroyed

  • Thread starter Thread starter Istiak
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Star
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The energy released when the 'Death Star' was destroyed can be calculated using the concept of gravitational binding energy. Given the mass of the 'Death Star' as 1021 kg and its radius as 667 km, the relevant equation for gravitational binding energy should be utilized. Participants in the discussion emphasized the importance of understanding the derivation and implications of this energy, rather than relying on unrelated equations from quantum mechanics or relativity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational binding energy
  • Familiarity with classical mechanics
  • Basic calculus for deriving equations
  • Knowledge of energy conservation principles
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the equation for gravitational binding energy on Wikipedia
  • Study the derivation of gravitational binding energy for spherical objects
  • Explore the implications of energy conservation in gravitational systems
  • Learn about the differences between classical and relativistic energy concepts
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, educators teaching classical mechanics, and anyone interested in astrophysics or energy calculations related to massive celestial bodies.

Istiak
Messages
158
Reaction score
12
Homework Statement
In the movie "Star Wars: A new Hope", Luke Skywalker blows up the 'death star'. Assume that the 'death star' is a perfectly spherical spaceship with uniform mass distribution. The mass of 'Death Star' ##M=1021 \mathrm{kg}## and the radius ##R=667\mathrm{km}## Estimate the amount of the energy that was released when the 'Death Star' was destroyed. Assume that initially all the energy was stored as the gravitational potential energy of the 'Death Star' and that after the explosion, the remaining parts of the spaceship are infinitesimally small and infinitely far from each other
Relevant Equations
E=h\nu
> In the movie "Star Wars: A new Hope", Luke Skywalker blows up the 'death star'. Assume that the 'death star' is a perfectly spherical spaceship with uniform mass distribution. The mass of 'Death Star' ##M=1021 \mathrm{kg}## and the radius ##R=667\mathrm{km}## Estimate the amount of the energy that was released when the 'Death Star' was destroyed. Assume that initially all the energy was stored as the gravitational potential energy of the 'Death Star' and that after the explosion, the remaining parts of the spaceship are infinitesimally small and infinitely far from each other

>>
photo_2022-01-23_19-19-13.jpg


##E=h\nu##
##E=pc##
##E=h\frac{c}{\lambda}##
##V=mgh##
##E=p\lambda\nu##

And no matter what I do one or two value is always unknown.
##\nu\text{,}\\ \lambda \text{,} \\ p## frequency, wavelength and momentum respectively.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Neither of these equations is relevant to the problem. The question is about the gravitational energy that binds the entire mass together.
Try looking through your notes for a relevant equation (I don't suspect they'd want you to derive it from scratch).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
Bandersnatch said:
Neither of these equations is relevant to the problem. The question is about the gravitational energy that binds the entire mass together.
Try looking through your notes for a relevant equation (I don't suspect they'd want you to derive it from scratch).
It's last year Olympiad's question.. I was looking for more equation but couldn't find out...
 
Are you at all familiar with the concept of binding energy?
 
Bandersnatch said:
Are you at all familiar with the concept of binding energy?
E=mc^2 ? or ##\Delta E = \Delta M c^2##
E^2=(mc^2)^2+(pc)^2

If that's what you meant then yes.
 
No, that's not it (although it is related). We don't need relativity, as this is a classical problem.

You know how it takes some amount of kinetic energy to throw a massive object from the surface of the Earth to infinity? This kinetic energy 'pays for' the equal magnitude of negative potential energy that the body has by the virtue of sitting deep in a gravitational field. That negative potential energy is an example of binding energy associated with - in this case - the gravitational force.
Here, we have a similar situation, but we're not putting a single object away from the central mass - we're putting every bit of mass in the central object away from every other bit. We're unbinding the death star.
Deriving the result requires some calculus, but I suspect the question just wants you to know which equation to use.

I think at this stage it'd be best if you simply went and read about 'gravitational binding energy' e.g. on (English) Wikipedia. You'll find an equation there that you can just plug in the numbers to, together with its derivation. But perhaps more importantly, you should read about what it represents, and try to intuitively understand how it's arrived at, so that you can relate any other similar problem to the concept in the future.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: PeroK and Istiak
Bandersnatch said:
No, that's not it (although it is related). We don't need relativity, as this is a classical problem.

You know how it takes some amount of kinetic energy to throw a massive object from the surface of the Earth to infinity? This kinetic energy 'pays for' the equal magnitude of negative potential energy that the body has by the virtue of sitting deep in a gravitational field. That negative potential energy is an example of binding energy associated with - in this case - the gravitational force.
Here, we have a similar situation, but we're not putting a single object away from the central mass - we're putting every bit of mass in the central object away from every other bit. We're unbinding the death star.
Deriving the result requires some calculus, but I suspect the question just wants you to know which equation to use.

I think at this stage it'd be best if you simply went and read about 'gravitational binding energy' e.g. on (English) Wikipedia. You'll find an equation there that you can just plug in the numbers to, together with its derivation. But perhaps more importantly, you should read about what it represents, and try to intuitively understand how it's arrived at, so that you can relate any other similar problem to the concept in the future.
Thanks; Solved! going to look at GBE.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
696
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
9K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K