MHB Find the factors using a complete square

mathlearn
Messages
331
Reaction score
0
Problem

First you are asked to,

write this expression as a complete square $x^2+2ax+a^2$

& ii. Using that find the factors of $x^2+2ax+a^2-9$

Workings

i $(a + x)^2$

Where do I need help

ii. Using that find the factors of $x^2+2ax+a^2-9$

Many Thanks :)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
mathlearn said:
Problem

First you are asked to,

write this expression as a complete square $x^2+2ax+a^2$

& ii. Using that find the factors of $x^2+2ax+a^2-9$

Workings

i $(a + x)^2$

Where do I need help

ii. Using that find the factors of $x^2+2ax+a^2-9$

Many Thanks :)

You want to factorize $(a+x)^2-9$. But this is same as $(a+x)^2-3^2=(a+x-3)(a+x+3)$.
 
caffeinemachine said:
You want to factorize $(a+x)^2-9$. But this is same as $(a+x)^2-3^2=(a+x-3)(a+x+3)$.

Thank you very much caffeinemachine :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Back
Top