Find the function phi(r,t) given its partial derivatives.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The function phi(r,t) cannot be defined due to the non-exactness of the differential form dt^* = (1 - k/r) dt + 0 dr. The necessary condition for a differential form to be exact, which is that the partial derivatives must satisfy the equality ∂M/∂y = ∂N/∂x, is not met in this case. Consequently, the corresponding function t^*(r,t) does not exist. This conclusion is supported by the analysis of the partial derivatives involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential forms in calculus
  • Familiarity with partial derivatives and their properties
  • Knowledge of exact differentials and conditions for exactness
  • Basic concepts of functions of multiple variables
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of exact differentials in multivariable calculus
  • Explore the implications of non-exact forms in differential equations
  • Learn about integrating factors and their role in making non-exact forms exact
  • Investigate the applications of differential forms in physics and engineering
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone studying multivariable calculus or differential equations who seeks to understand the conditions for the existence of functions defined by their partial derivatives.

stedwards
Messages
416
Reaction score
46
I would like to define [itex]t^*= \phi(r, t)[/itex] given [itex]dt^* = \left( 1-\frac{k}{r} \right) dt + 0dr[/itex] where k is a constant.

Perhaps it doesn't exist. It appears so simple, yet I've been running around in circles. Any hints?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You want ##dt^*## to be an exact form, so that you can integrate it. An exact form can be expressed as

$$ df = M dx + N dy,~~~M = \frac{\partial f}{\partial x},~~~N = \frac{\partial f}{\partial y},$$

therefore a necessary condition that ##df## be exact is that

$$ \frac{\partial M}{\partial y} = \frac{\partial N}{\partial x}.$$

The corresponding relation for ##dt^*## fails, so we conclude that it is not exact and the corresponding ##t^*(r,t)## does not exist.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: beyondthemaths, stedwards and HallsofIvy
Nicely done. Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K