Find the location and length of the final image

  • Thread starter Thread starter hraghav
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Image Length
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the location and length of the final image produced by a lens and a mirror. The user found the mirror image location to be -58.2628 cm and the length of the image to be -9.40012 cm, but later realized these values were incorrect. The calculations involved using the lens equation and magnification formulas, leading to confusion about the final image's characteristics and signs. Participants emphasized the importance of accurate ray diagrams and noted that the negative sign in the image distance indicates a virtual image, which would be upright. The user ultimately expressed gratitude for the assistance received in correcting their answers.
hraghav
Messages
48
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
An object of length 3.23cm is located at the origin of a coordinate system. A concave reflecting surface is located at 30.5cmi^, and has a radius of 45.4cm. A converging lens of focal length 42cm is located at −83cmi^. This arrangement is shown in the diagram below. The light from the object that reflects off the mirror then refracts through the lens. The image from the mirror acts as an object for the lens, and the lens produces the final image. HINT: This question uses a coordinate system, but your lens and mirror formulas use scalar quantities with a set of rules. Use the coordinate system to convert and calculate the scalar quantities, then draw out the lens/mirror system and convert back into the coordinate system. The more accurate your drawing, the better your analysis will be. What is the location of the final image of the object as produced by the lens? What is the length of the final image of the object as produced by the lens? (A negative value means the image is inverted relative to the object orientation.)
Relevant Equations
1/f = 1/do + 1/di
Mm = -di/do
Ml = di/do
So I found the location of the image of the object produced by the mirror to be -58.2628 cmi^ and the length of the image of the object produced by the mirror to be -9.40012 cm. (these are correct values).

To find the location of the final image of the object as produced by the lens I used 1/f = 1/do + 1/di where
f = 45.4/2 = 22.7
do = 30.5
and found di = 88.7628
Then I added 30.5 - 88.7628 = -58.2628 (mirror image)
For object distance from lens: do = -58.2628 - (-83) = 24.7372
As Lens's focal length is 42 cm, using lens equation:
1 / 42 = 1 / 24.7372 + 1 /di
where di = -60.18504 as the final answer

For the length:
I used the mirror magnification formula ie Mm = -di/do = - 88.7628/ 30.5 = -2.91
Lens magnification formula ie Ml = di/do = -60.18504/ 24.7372 = -2.4329
total magnification is M = Mm * Ml
M = -2.91 * -2.4329 = 7.07996

Image length is 3.23 * 7.07996 = 22.8682

Both my answers are incorrect and I am not sure where I am making an error. Could someone please look at this and help me out?
Thank you!
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2024-07-19 at 2.58.40 PM.png
    Screenshot 2024-07-19 at 2.58.40 PM.png
    27.9 KB · Views: 44
Physics news on Phys.org
hraghav said:
The more accurate your drawing, the better your analysis will be.
You need a good ray diagram with distances and x-coordinates both marked. Without that, things can go horribly wrong!

hraghav said:
where di = -60.18504 as the final answer
Are you expected to convert this back to an x-coordinate? Maybe that's the problem.
(Also, units are missing and there are far too many significant figures.)

From my (distant) memories the negative sign here indicates that the image is virtual. In that case, the lens's image will be upright, not inverted - like a simple magnifying glass.
 
Thank you for your help I got both the answers :)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Steve4Physics
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top