Find the moment of inertia of a thin wire of mass

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The moment of inertia of a thin wire bent into a square shape without a top, with each side of length b, is calculated using the formula I = I1 + I2 + I3. The moment of inertia for the two vertical uprights is determined to be (m/3)b². The horizontal part's contribution is debated, with one perspective suggesting it should be considered as 1/12(m/3)b² due to its center of mass being at the origin. The discussion emphasizes the importance of the parallel axis theorem and the correct definition of the rotation axis when calculating the total moment of inertia.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of moment of inertia concepts
  • Familiarity with the parallel axis theorem
  • Knowledge of basic mechanics and rigid body dynamics
  • Ability to apply the superposition principle in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the parallel axis theorem in detail
  • Learn about the moment of inertia for various geometric shapes
  • Explore the superposition principle in mechanics
  • Review rigid body dynamics and rotational motion equations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators and anyone involved in solving problems related to moment of inertia and rotational dynamics.

airbauer33
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Moment of inertia

Homework Statement


Find the moment of inertia of a thin wire of mass, m, bent into a square without a top, with each side being of length, b, about its axis of symmetry. (looks like field goal uprights)


Homework Equations



I = I1 + I2 + I3

The Attempt at a Solution



I know the two uprights I are (m/3)b^2. I found a solution on the net that shows the moment of inertia of the horizontal part being 0 because its center of mass is at the origin. I think that there should still be a 1/12(m/3)b^2 contribution from the horizontal part.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm, I don't know if I necessarily agree with your statement for the uprights. Did you try to superpose two rods? You have to remember that the mass given to you is for the whole square thing. The rod equations you are using are not accounting for that. You should also consider that the equation you are using uses the bottom of the rod as the rotation axis. Hint: you may want to consider the parallel axis theorem.

Sorry I can't be much more help, but I don't know what you mean by solution on the net. Where is your origin defined?
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
15K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K