Find the radius of a geo-stationary satellite

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kolahal Bhattacharya
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radius Satellite
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The radius of a geo-stationary satellite (R_s) can be determined using the equation R_s^3 = gR_e^2/w^2, where g represents gravitational acceleration, R_e is the Earth's radius, and w is the angular velocity. According to Kleppner's solution, R_s is approximately 6.6 times R_e. The discussion highlights the challenge of eliminating the fractional exponent in the equation, suggesting that numerical substitution may be necessary to derive the 6.6 relationship definitively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational physics and satellite motion
  • Familiarity with the concepts of angular velocity and gravitational acceleration
  • Knowledge of algebraic manipulation and exponent rules
  • Basic comprehension of the relationship between mass and gravitational force
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the geostationary orbit formula in detail
  • Learn about the implications of angular velocity in satellite dynamics
  • Explore numerical methods for solving algebraic equations with fractional exponents
  • Investigate the application of Kleppner's principles in modern astrophysics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, aerospace engineering, and astronomy who are interested in satellite mechanics and gravitational theory.

Kolahal Bhattacharya
Messages
133
Reaction score
1
To find the radius of a geo-stationary satellite in terms of R_e, we see---

M_s*w^2*R_s=G*M_eM_s/R_s^2 from where using GM_e=g R_e^2,

We get R_s^3=gR_e^2/w^2. w can be evaluated. The problem is because of the fact that
Kleppner provides the soln. R_s=6.6R_e.How, one can get rid of fractional exponent?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My guess is that you have to plug in the numbers, and then in the end get the 6.6 relationship. I don't see an algebraic way to do it offhand.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
35
Views
4K