Find the range of possible dimensions for a volume

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the range of possible dimensions for a storage container with a volume of at least 8436 m³, given the constraints that the length (l) is 1 meter more than triple the width (w), and the height (h) is 5 meters less than double the width. The polynomial equation derived is 6w³ - 13w² - 5w - 8436 = 0, with a root found at w = 12, leading to dimensions l = 37 and h = 19. The correct interpretation of the constraints is that w must be greater than or equal to 12, while l and h are defined by the equations l = 3w + 1 and h = 2w - 5, respectively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polynomial equations and their roots
  • Knowledge of inequalities and their applications in geometry
  • Familiarity with algebraic manipulation and factorization
  • Basic concepts of volume calculation for rectangular prisms
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore polynomial factorization techniques in algebra
  • Study inequalities and their graphical representations
  • Learn about volume optimization problems in geometry
  • Investigate the implications of constraints in mathematical modeling
USEFUL FOR

Students studying algebra and geometry, educators teaching volume optimization, and anyone involved in mathematical modeling of physical dimensions.

Traced
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
The specifications for a storage container state that the length is 1 metre more than triple the width and the height is 5 metres less than double the width. Find the range of possible dimensions for a volume of at least 8436m^3
Relevant Equations
None
I understand how to get the dimensions that equal 8436m^3. What I don't understand is how to find the range of all possible dimensions.

I solved the inequality to get ##6w^{3}-13w^{2}-5w-8436##

Using systematic guessing I found the root is x=4, so the factor is x-4.

Dividing (x-4) into ##6w^{3}-13w^{2}-5w-8436## gives me ##6w^{2}+59w+703##

so, ##6w^3-13w^{2}-5w-8436 = (w-12)(6w^{2}+59w+703)##.

this means that

w=12
l=3(12)+1=37
h=2(12)-5=19

v=lwh
v=8436

This is as far as I get. I don't understand how to find the range of all possible dimensions.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It says the range of dimensions l,w,h of at least 8436 m^3

so l=1, w=1, h=1 gives 1 m^3 which is less than 8436 m^3

But I think you also have to consider the limits for l, w, h ie ##l = 3w## and ##h = 2w - 5##

since h must be greater than 0 then 2w=5 meaning w>=xxx at a minimum and similarly for the maximums too.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Traced
jedishrfu said:
It says the range of dimensions l,w,h of at least 8436 m^3

so l=1, w=1, h=1 gives 1 m^3 which is less than 8436 m^3

But I think you also have to consider the limits for l, w, h ie ##l = 3w## and ##h = 2w - 5##

since h must be greater than 0 then 2w=5 meaning w>=xxx at a minimum and similarly for the maximums too.

I'm still confused. Could you explain it a bit more please? Right now I have 3 dimensions, l=37, w=12 and h=19. The dimensions I have the minimum dimensions that will give a box of ##8436m^{3}##. I'm confused by
But I think you also have to consider the limits for l, w, h ie ##l = 3w## and ##h = 2w - 5##

I guess I could do something like this?

w>=12
l>=37
h>=19

I don't know if that is how the question is meant to be solved though.
 
Last edited:
Traced said:
Homework Statement:: The specifications for a storage container state that the length is 1 metre more than triple the width and the height is 5 metres less than double the width. Find the range of possible dimensions for a volume of at least 8436m^3
Relevant Equations:: None

I understand how to get the dimensions that equal 8436m^3. What I don't understand is how to find the range of all possible dimensions.

I solved the inequality to get ##6w^{3}-13w^{2}-5w-8436##
That's not an inequality -- it should include <, or >, or >=, or <=.
The actual inequality is ##w(3w + 1)(2w - 5) \ge 8436## (##m^3##).

What you solved was the equation ## w(3w + 1)(2w - 5) = 8436##

Traced said:
Using systematic guessing I found the root is x=4, so the factor is x-4.

Dividing (x-4) into ##6w^{3}-13w^{2}-5w-8436## gives me ##6w^{2}+59w+703##

so, ##6w^3-13w^{2}-5w-8436 = (w-12)(6w^{2}+59w+703)##.

this means that

w=12
l=3(12)+1=37
h=2(12)-5=19
Assuming your algebra is correct, if w, l and h are as above, you'll get the minimum volume. If you increase w, that will cause l and h to increase, and result in a larger volume. So the range for w is ##w \ge 12##. What would be the ranges for l and h?
Traced said:
v=lwh
v=8436

This is as far as I get. I don't understand how to find the range of all possible dimensions.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Traced and Delta2
Traced said:
I guess I could do something like this?

w>=12
l>=37
h>=19

I don't know if that is how the question is meant to be solved though.
I think you added this after I started my earlier reply. I believe you're on the right track here, but you still need to work in the constraints that l = 3w + 1, and h = 2w - 5.
So you'll have an inequality for w, but equations for l and h, both of which are in terms of w.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Traced
Traced said:
found the root is x=4
You mean w-12, right?
Traced said:
how to find the range of all possible dimensions
Does the polynomial you found have any other real roots?
What does that tell you about the values it takes as you increase w?
 
Mark44 said:
I think you added this after I started my earlier reply. I believe you're on the right track here, but you still need to work in the constraints that l = 3w + 1, and h = 2w - 5.
So you'll have an inequality for w, but equations for l and h, both of which are in terms of w.
Sorry I'm still confused. I'm just not really understanding this.
 
Traced said:
Sorry I'm still confused. I'm just not really understanding this.
From the problem statement in post 1:
Traced said:
The specifications for a storage container state that the length is 1 metre more than triple the width and the height is 5 metres less than double the width.
From post 3:
Traced said:
w>=12
l>=37
h>=19
The first inequality is correct, but l and h are constrained by the conditions in the problem statement. So w can be any value >= 12, but the values of l and h depend directly on the value of w.
 
Mark44 said:
From the problem statement in post 1:

From post 3:

The first inequality is correct, but l and h are constrained by the conditions in the problem statement. So w can be any value >= 12, but the values of l and h depend directly on the value of w.
Do you mean like this?
l>=3w+1 and h>=2w-5?
This way the length and the height have the constraints.
 
  • #10
Traced said:
Do you mean like this?
l>=3w+1 and h>=2w-5?
This way the length and the height have the constraints.
No. Here's what I mean:
##w \ge 12##
##l = 3w + 1##
##h = 2w - 5##
w can take on any value 12 or larger, but the two equations guarantee that l and h satisfy the given constraints. They wouldn't do so with the two inequalities you wrote.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Traced

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K