MHB Find the roots of f(x)+g(x)+h(x) = 0.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aryan Pandey1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Roots
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding the roots of the equation f(x) + g(x) + h(x) = 0, where f(x), g(x), and h(x) are quadratic polynomials with positive leading coefficients and real, distinct roots. Each polynomial shares a common root with at least one other, leading to the formulation of f(x), g(x), and h(x) in terms of their roots. The combined polynomial is expressed in standard quadratic form, allowing the application of the quadratic formula to find the roots. The coefficients A, B, and C are derived from the roots and constants associated with each polynomial. The discussion concludes with a focus on the algebraic approach to solving the problem, acknowledging the potential for a more elegant solution.
Aryan Pandey1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Let f(x) , g(x) and h(x) be the quadratic polynomials having positive leading coefficients an real and distinct roots. If each pair of them has a common root , then find the roots of f(x)+g(x)+h(x) = 0.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Aryan Pandey said:
Let f(x) , g(x) and h(x) be the quadratic polynomials having positive leading coefficients an real and distinct roots. If each pair of them has a common root , then find the roots of f(x)+g(x)+h(x) = 0.

Looked at this problem off and on for the last few days trying to come up with some elegant solution. Failed in that endeavor and resorted to grunt work algebra to determine a solution. Please note that this does not mean an "elegant", simple solution doesn't exist.

let $f(x)=a(x-r_1)(x-r_2)$
$g(x) = b(x-r_2)(x-r_3)$,
and $h(x) = c(x-r_1)(x-r_3)$
where $a$, $b$, and $c$ are arbitrary positive constants and $r_1$, $r_2$, and $r_3$ are the real, distinct roots.

$f(x)+g(x)+h(x) = (a+b+c)x^2 - [a(r_1+r_2)+b(r_2+r_3)+c(r_1+r_3)]x+(ar_1r_2+br_2r_3+cr_1r_3)$

quadratic formula ...

$x = \dfrac{-B \pm \sqrt{B^2-4AC}}{2A}$, where

$A = (a+b+c)$
$B = -[a(r_1+r_2)+b(r_2+r_3)+c(r_1+r_3)]$
$C = (ar_1r_2+br_2r_3+cr_1r_3)$
 
Last edited by a moderator:
$$(px-a)(qx-b)+(px-a)(rx-c)+(qx-b)(rx-c)=0$$

$$R=\left(\frac ap,\frac bq\right),\,\left(\frac ap,\frac cr\right),\,\left(\frac bq,\frac cr\right)$$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top