TytoAlba95
- 132
- 19
- Homework Statement
- See below
- Relevant Equations
- See below
Where did I go wrong?
Find the third side of a Triangle
- Thread starter TytoAlba95
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Triangle
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
10 replies · 2K views
Where did I go wrong?
- 6,002
- 2,629
From where do you know that that angle is 60 degrees? We have no explicit information on the angles of the triangle, so how did you infer it from the given data?
Instead try to think what are the possible values for the third side (hint: the triangle is isosceles) and try to find a reason to reject one value so you ll be left with the other.
Instead try to think what are the possible values for the third side (hint: the triangle is isosceles) and try to find a reason to reject one value so you ll be left with the other.
Last edited:
- 38,138
- 10,725
So of the four potential answers, only two of them should be considered.Delta2 said:
Gold Member
- 4,194
- 2,389
Please, see:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isosceles_triangle
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isosceles_triangle
TytoAlba95
- 132
- 19
The other side can be between, (7+3=)10 and (7-3=)4 cm, being an isosceles triangle, the third side should be either 7 or 3. As 3 is below the range so 7cm is the length of the other side. Thanks for the pointer.
Last edited by a moderator:
- 6,002
- 2,629
Very well i find your reasoning correct. You used the triangular inequality. I had another reasoning in my mind using the cosine law. Let me know if you want to hear it.TytoAlba95 said:
Last edited by a moderator:
- 38,138
- 10,725
Which is fine, but requires calculation that probably can't be done in one's head. A variation of the technique used by the OP is to draw two isosceles triangles: one with two sides of 3 units, and the other with two sides of 7 units. Pretty clearly the one with a pair of sides of 3 units can't also have a side of 7 units, but the one with a pair of 7 unit sides can have a third side of 3 units.Delta2 said:
- 6,002
- 2,629
It is not that hard. Take a triangle isosceles with two sides of 3. We can prove using the cosine law that the third side has an upper bound of 6.Mark44 said:
- 5,706
- 1,592
Delta2 said:
That's not exactly the simplest way to prove 6 is the upper bound.
- 6,002
- 2,629
No it isnt. Using the triangular inequality is probably the simplest way.Office_Shredder said:
TytoAlba95
- 132
- 19
I actually needed the simplest, or more precisely the shortest method to answer this question, as I was preparing for a MCQ-based exam.
Thank you everyone for your pointers and inputs. Thank you Delta2. :)
Thank you everyone for your pointers and inputs. Thank you Delta2. :)