Find Transcendental Equation for Triple Delta Potential Energy

  • Thread starter Thread starter mtjs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Delta Potential
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the bound energy of a triple delta potential represented by the equation V(x) = -w [δ(x-a) + δ(x) + δ(x+a)]. Participants are exploring the correct transcendental equation for kappa related to this potential energy setup.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the continuity conditions for the wave functions at various points, particularly at x = 0, x = a, and x = -a. There are questions about the adequacy of the wave function forms and whether additional equations are necessary to fully describe the system.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the wave function forms and their implications for the bound energy. Some participants suggest that the current approach may not be general enough to capture all solutions, while others are verifying the correctness of the equations derived for specific points.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted concern regarding the influence of the parameter 'a' on the bound energy values, as well as the need for the wave functions to satisfy multiple conditions simultaneously. Participants are also considering the implications of their chosen wave functions on the overall solution.

mtjs
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm looking for the bound energy of a triple delta potential:

[tex]V(x) = -w \left [ \delta(x-a) + \delta(x) + \delta(x+a) \right ][/tex]

What is the correct transcendental equation for kappa?

Homework Equations



My wave function is [tex]\psi_1(x) = A e^{\kappa x}[/tex] for x < -a, [tex]\psi_2(x) = B \cosh(\kappa(x+a/2)[/tex] for -a < x < 0, [tex]\psi_3(x) = C \cosh(\kappa(x-a/2))[/tex] for 0< x < a, [tex]\psi_4(x) = D e^{-\kappa x}[/tex] forx > a.

We use this continuity formula [tex]\psi'( z+\epsilon) - \psi'(z-\epsilon) = -\frac{2mw}{\hbar^2} \psi(z)[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



Calculating the continuity formula at x = 0 gives [tex]\kappa \tanh(\frac{\kappa a}{2}) = \frac{m w}{\hbar^2}[/tex]

This means, you get the same bound energy as for one delta potential if a is very large, and something weird for small a?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Very large a just mean your particle is in the middle and the other parts are not important.

Shouldn't there be a second equation from the second potential? And I think your approach for the inner wavefunctions is not general enough to find all solutions.
 
Is my equation for x = 0 correct? For x = a or x = -a, you get the same transcendental equation as for the double-delta potential?

[tex]1 + \tanh(\frac{\kappa a}{2}) =\frac{2 m w}{\hbar^2 \kappa}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
mtjs said:
Is my equation for x = 0 correct?
For your chosen wavefunctions, it looks fine.

For x = a or x = -a, you get the same transcendental equation as for the double-delta potential?

[tex]1 + \tanh(\frac{\kappa a}{2}) =\frac{2 m w}{\hbar^2 kappa}[/tex]
Up to factors of two maybe, but you have to check your ansatz for the wavefunctions.
 
So after all, you get two different bound energy values. One for the delta at x = 0 and one for two deltas at x = -a and x = a.
 
Last edited:
That just shows your wavefunction is not general enough. The bound energy states have to satisfy both equations at the same time.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Now I see where I did wrong.

The correct wave function is:
[tex]\psi_1(x) = A e^{\kappa x}[/tex]
for x < -a,

[tex]\psi_2(x) = B e^{\kappa x} + C e^{-\kappa x}[/tex]
for -a < x < 0,

[tex]\psi_3(x) = D e^{\kappa x} + E e^{-\kappa x}[/tex]

for 0< x < a,

[tex]\psi_4(x) = F e^{-\kappa x}[/tex]
for x > a.
 
That is better, right.

I would use ##\psi_1(x) = A e^{\kappa (x+a)}## and similar expressions to make the coefficients easier to evaluate, but that is a detail.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K