MHB  Find Value of $k$ for Equation with One Real Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter juantheron
  • Start date Start date
juantheron
Messages
243
Reaction score
1
find value of $k$ for which the equation $x^4+(1-2k)x^2+(k^2-1) = 0$ has one real solution
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
jacks said:
find value of $k$ for which the equation $x^4+(1-2k)x^2+(k^2-1) = 0$ has one real solution

This is a quadratic equation (let $u=x^2$ if you need to make it clearer) so you can use the discriminant to find the values of k - we know that there is one real solution if the discriminant is equal to 0

Hence we're looking for a value of k such that: $b^2 - 4ac = 0$

In this instance
  • $a = 1$
  • $b = 1-2k$
  • $c = k^2 -1$
 
SuperSonic4 said:
This is a quadratic equation (let $u=x^2$ if you need to make it clearer) so you can use the discriminant to find the values of k - we know that there is one real solution if the discriminant is equal to 0
I don't believe that is correct. If the discriminant is 0, then the quadratic has one real root. But if that root is negative, there is no real solution to the quartic while if it is positive, there are two real roots. In order that there be only one real root to the original quartic is if the quadratic has, as its only positive root, u= 0 so that the only real root to the original quartic is 0. That means that the quadratic in u must be simply u^2= 0. In other words, we must have both 1- 2k= 0 and k^2- 1= 0. The first equation has only k= 1/2 as solution and the second has only k= 1 or k= -1 as solutions. There is no value of k that makes both 0 so there is no value of k that gives only a single real root to the original quartic equation.

Hence we're looking for a value of k such that: $b^2 - 4ac = 0$

In this instance
  • $a = 1$
  • $b = 1-2k$
  • $c = k^2 -1$
With those equations,
b^2= (1- 2k)^2= 4k^2- 4k+ 1
4ac= 4k^2- 4 so b^2- 4ac= 4k^2- 4k+ 1- 4k^32+ 4= -4k+ 5= 0 so k= 5/4.
In that case, 1- 2k= 1- 5/2= -3/2 and k^2- 1= 25/16- 1= 9/16. The quadratic equation for u is u^2- (3/2)u+ 9/16= (u- 3/4)^2= 0 so that u= 3/4. But then x^2= 3/4 so the original equation has the two roots x= \sqrt{3}/2 and -\sqrt{3}/2
 
Last edited by a moderator:
We are slowly getting there! The equation is a quadratic in $x^2$. Therefore if $x_0$ is a solution, so is $-x_0$. The only way for there to be a unique real solution is if that solution is 0. The condition for 0 to be a solution is that the constant term vanishes. Thus $k^2-1=0,$ and so $k= 1$ or $k=-1.$ If $k=1$ then the equation becomes $x^4 -x^2=0$. But that has solutions $x=\pm1$ as well as $x=0.$ So we can rule out that case, and the only remaining possibility is $k=-1.$

If $k=-1$ then the equation becomes $x^4+3x^2=0$, and that does indeed have $x=0$ as its only real root. So the answer to the problem is that $k=-1.$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top