MHB Find x- and y- Intercepts....4

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the x- and y-intercepts of the polynomial y = 2x^5 - 5x^4 + 5. The y-intercept is determined to be at the point (0,5) when x is set to 0. To find the x-intercept, the equation 0 = 2x^5 - 5x^4 + 5 is analyzed, but it is noted that this polynomial likely does not have roots expressible in elementary functions. The complexity of solving quintic equations is acknowledged, and the use of numerical root-finding techniques or tools like Wolfram Alpha is recommended for approximating real roots. The discussion concludes with an understanding that advanced techniques may be necessary for finding "nice" roots in this case.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Find the x- and y-intercepts.

y = 2x^5 - 5x^4 + 5

Let x = 0

y = 2(0)^5 - 5(0)^4 + 5

y = 5

The y-intercept is y = 5 and it takes place at the point (0,5).

Let y = 0 to find the x-intercept.

0 = 2x^5 - 5x^4 + 5

I am stuck here.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I don't think $0 = 2x^5 - 5x^4 + 5$ has roots that can be expressed in terms of elementary functions.
 
More "nice" roots, right?
 
There's always a solution(s) for polynomials of degree 4 and lower (if one includes complex-valued results). Once we reach a degree of 5 we are, in general, out of luck (so to speak) but there are some quintics (polynomials of degree 5) that are solvable. I don't think the one we have here is, though.

A useful online tool is W|A (Wolfram Alpha). I will suggest that you familiarize yourself with this tool as it can aid insight into problems that may be difficult. :D
 
For any polynomial of degree 3 or more that doesn't succumb to the rational roots theorem to get down to a combination of linear/quadratic factors, I rely on numeric root finding techniques to approximate the real roots (and those are the only roots we need for finding intercepts). :D
 
You are saying that "nice" roots in this case require advanced techniques. I am not there yet. I get it now.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Back
Top