Finding a basis for the linear transformation S(A)=A^T?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a basis for the linear transformation defined by the operation \( S(A) = A^T \), where \( S: M_{2×2}(ℝ)→M_{2×2}(ℝ) \). Participants explore the implications of this transformation on 2x2 matrices and how to express them in a different form.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to express the transformation in terms of a basis and questions how to form a four-dimensional basis from the transformation of matrices. Another participant suggests flattening the matrices into 4-vectors to facilitate the transformation matrix construction.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the approach to take, specifically regarding the flattening of matrices. The original poster indicates progress by stating they have solved the problem, but the details of the solution are not discussed.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the vec() operator in mathematics and its relation to the flatten function in programming, which may influence how participants think about matrix transformations.

Eclair_de_XII
Messages
1,082
Reaction score
91

Homework Statement


"Find ##S_\alpha## where ##S: M_{2×2}(ℝ)→M_{2×2}(ℝ)## is defined by ##S(A)=A^T##.

Homework Equations


##A^T=\begin{pmatrix}
a_{11} & a_{21} \\
a_{12} & a_{22}
\end{pmatrix}##

##\alpha= \{
{\begin{pmatrix}
1 & 0 \\
0 & 0 \end{pmatrix},
\begin{pmatrix}
0 & 0 \\
1 & 0 \end{pmatrix},
\begin{pmatrix}
0 & 1 \\
0 & 0 \end{pmatrix},
\begin{pmatrix}
0 & 0 \\
0 & 1 \end{pmatrix}} \}##

The Attempt at a Solution


I've found ##S_\alpha## before where the vectors can be expressed as columns, but i have no experience with finding the transformation matrices for actual matrices. Can anyone help me? This is as far as I got:

##S(A)=A^T=\begin{pmatrix}
a_{11} & a_{21} \\
a_{12} & a_{22} \end{pmatrix}=a_{11}\begin{pmatrix}1 & 0 \\
0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}+a_{12}\begin{pmatrix}
0 & 0 \\
1 & 0 \end{pmatrix}+a_{21}\begin{pmatrix}
0 & 1 \\
0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}+a_{22}\begin{pmatrix}
0 & 0 \\
0 & 1 \end{pmatrix}
##

How would I form this into a four-dimensional basis?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Flatten each of the 2 x 2 matrices into a 4-vector by concatenating its columns, eg
$$flatten\left(A^T\right) = \langle a_{11},a_{12},a_{21},a_{22} \rangle$$
Then the flattened versions of the four matrices on the RHS of your last equation, suitably re-ordered based on the order of their coefficients in ##flatten(A)##, become the columns of the 4 x 4 transformation matrix.
 
Okay, I solved it. Thanks for telling me about that function...
 
Note: in math this function is typically called the

vec() operator and has interesting uses with Kronecker products.

in certain programming languages, you'll see it called flatten (e.g. numpy.flatten() in python, though you need to specify column order as it defaults to row ordering.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K