Finding a monic polynomial with 2^.5 + 3^.5 as a root

  • Thread starter Thread starter B-Con
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polynomial Root
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a monic polynomial for the expression \( \sqrt{2} + \sqrt{3} \) in the context of number theory. The original poster seeks to prove the irrationality of this expression by identifying a suitable polynomial with integer coefficients.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the challenges of finding a polynomial that has \( \sqrt{2} + \sqrt{3} \) as a root, particularly the requirement for integer coefficients. There is mention of the need to consider linear dependence over the rationals and the implications of polynomial factors.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the nature of polynomials and the requirements for coefficients. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity involved in the problem, with references to external resources that may aid in understanding the approach. The conversation reflects a mix of exploration and clarification without reaching a definitive conclusion.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of integer or rational coefficients in the context of monic polynomials, and there is a recognition of potential ambiguities in the definitions being discussed.

B-Con
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Number Theory homework. I'm supposed to prove that the value
2^.5 + 3^.5
is irrational by finding a monic polynomial that the aforementioned number is a root of. This would be trivial if I were supposed to prove that just 2^.5 was irrational because its monic polynomial equation would be x^2 -2 = 0.

But I can't just raise 2^.5 + 3^.5 to a power and then subtract it to get my desired polynomial because all coefficients of a monic polynomial have to be integers, and 2^.5 + 3^.5 is obviously not an integer.

What method should I use to go about finding such a monic polynomial?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You should just do it, in the words of Tim Gowers. Of course raising it to some power and then subtracting it won't work. Why should it? But what's stopping you doing other things. A polynomial is just a linear dependence over Q of the various powers of that number. Try to find one.
 
If [itex]\sqrt{2}+ \sqrt{3}[/itex] is a root of a polynomial (with integer coefficients), then the polynomial must have [itex]x-\sqrt{2}- \sqrt{3}[/itex] as a factor. Write that as [itex](x-\sqrt{2})-\sqrt{3}[/itex] and think "(x-a)(x+a)= x2- a2".

By the way, saying "with integer coefficients" or at least "with rational coefficients" is necessary in this problem. Without that, an obvious answer is the linear polynomial [itex]x-\sqrt{2}- \sqrt{3}[/itex].
 
Thanks, I got it.

HallsofIvry said:
By the way, saying "with integer coefficients" or at least "with rational coefficients" is necessary in this problem.
Isn't that what a monic polynomial is by definition? Sorry, didn't mean to be ambiguous.
 
Now you've got it, I should point out that the reference to Gowers wasn't completely out of the blue. He has a web page with this very problem on it done purely in terms of linear algebra.
 
B-Con said:
Thanks, I got it.


Isn't that what a monic polynomial is by definition? Sorry, didn't mean to be ambiguous.
Sorry, I saw "monic" but didn't think about it! Anyway, you weren't all that "ambiguous". I was pretty sure [itex]x-\sqrt{2}-\sqrt{3}[/itex] was not the answer!
 
matt grime said:
Now you've got it, I should point out that the reference to Gowers wasn't completely out of the blue. He has a web page with this very problem on it done purely in terms of linear algebra.

Thanks for the tip, I'll check it out. I figured Gowers was simply someone who I hadn't heard of before.

By the way, I like the quote in your sig.

HallsofIvy said:
Sorry, I saw "monic" but didn't think about it!
Heh, no problem. :-p
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K