Finding a numerical value for a partial differential

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating partial differentials of the compressibility factor Z, defined by the Lee and Kessler equation of state, with respect to pressure (P) and temperature (T). The user seeks clarification on whether the pseudo-variable v_r can be treated as a constant when taking these derivatives. It is established that v_r is dependent on both P and T, and thus cannot be treated as constant. The correct approach involves accounting for both the change in Z due to v_r and the direct contribution from T when differentiating.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of partial differential equations
  • Familiarity with the Lee and Kessler equation of state
  • Knowledge of reduced pressure and temperature concepts
  • Basic calculus, particularly differentiation techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Lee and Kessler equation of state
  • Learn how to compute partial derivatives in multivariable calculus
  • Research the implications of pseudo-variables in thermodynamic equations
  • Explore numerical methods for solving nonlinear equations in thermodynamics
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, engineers, and students in thermodynamics, particularly those working with equations of state and partial differential equations in fluid mechanics.

NEGATIVE_40
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
I have a function [tex]Z = f(P,T)[/tex]
and would like to calculate the partial differentials [tex]\left ( \frac{\partial Z}{\partial P} \right )_T[/tex] and [tex]\left ( \frac{\partial Z}{\partial T} \right )_P[/tex] at values of P and T.

The function Z is compressibility factor (Lee and Kessler equation of state), P and T refer to pressure and temperature. The equation for Z is quite large;
[tex]Z = \frac{P_rv_r}{T_r} = 1 + \frac{B}{v_r} + \frac{C}{v_r^2} + \frac{D}{v_r^5}+\frac{c_4}{T_r^3v_r^2}\left ( \beta +\frac{\gamma}{v_r^2} \right )\exp\left ( -\frac{\gamma}{v_r^2} \right )[/tex]
T_r and P_r refer to reduced pressures and temperatures:
[tex]T_r = \frac{T}{T_c},~~P_r = \frac{P}{P_c}[/tex] Other variables are constants and other expressions with T_r and P_r in them.

The solution procedure is a bit weird, but the gist of it is you solve the right hand side of the Z equality for v_r (which is pseudo variable);
[tex]\frac{P_rv_r}{T_r} = 1 + \frac{B}{v_r} + \frac{C}{v_r^2} + \frac{D}{v_r^5}+\frac{c_4}{T_r^3v_r^2}\left ( \beta +\frac{\gamma}{v_r^2} \right )\exp\left ( -\frac{\gamma}{v_r^2} \right )[/tex]
then use some other relations and definitions to find Z. I have this part working correctly.

Although the expression for Z is long, I can find the derivatives manually.

Now, my question is this: can I treat v_r as being a constant when I take these derivatives manually? The value of v_r depends on both P and T when I am solving for it, so I'm not sure that I can.


Finally, if I do figure this out, how would I calculate the numerical value of:
[tex]\left ( \frac{\partial Z}{\partial P} \right )_T[/tex]
Since we are holding T constant, would it be equivalent to
[tex]\frac{\partial Z}{\partial P}[/tex] , treating T as constant when taking the derivatives?

Hopefully this makes sense, and my apologies if this isn't the appropriate place to ask.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, if I've understood you correctly, you have introduced a pseudo-variable v_r=v_r(p,T), so that your expression for Z may be rewritten as Z=Z(v_r(P,T), P,T).
Am I correct?

Written like this, a fixed P, and differentiation of Z with respect to T will need to account for TWO effects, the change in Z as the result of change in V_r, plus the "direct" contribution in the change of Z due to T.

To take a trivial example, set Z=v_r+P+T, v_r=P+2T, you'll see you need BOTH contributions to the total change in Z.
 
What I would suggest would be to write:
[tex]v_r=\frac{ZT_r}{P_r}[/tex]
[tex]dv_r=\frac{T_r}{P_r}dZ+\frac{Z}{P_r}dT_r-\frac{ZT_r}{P_r^2}dP_r[/tex]

So, [itex]dZ = (-\frac{B}{v_r^2}-2\frac{C}{v_r^3}+...)dv_r[/itex]+ dTr term


Substitute the second equation into this one, and solve for dZ as a function of dPr and dTr.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K