Finding a Power Series for a function

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
11 replies · 2K views
aerospacev
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find a power series representation for the function [itex]f(x) = \frac{(x-1)}{(3-x)^2}^2[/itex], valid for every [itex]x[/itex] with [itex]|x|<3[/itex]

Homework Equations



The equation that I think would be useful is [itex]\frac{1}{1-x} = \sum_{n=0}^\infty x^n[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I began by just looking at the term [itex]\frac{1}{(3-x)^2}[/itex]

[itex]\frac{1}{1-x} = \sum_{n=0}^\infty x^n[/itex]

differentiating both sides:

[itex]\frac{1}{(1-x)^2}= \sum_{n=1}^\infty nx^{(n-1)}[/itex]

now I'm stuck here, my train of thought is that if I can turn [itex]\frac{1}{(3-x)^2}[/itex] into someform of [itex]\frac{1}{(1-x)^2}[/itex] to obtain its summation formula, I can then multiply the polynomial [itex]{(x-1)}^2[/itex] to that summation and go from there.

Usually the assignment questions involve functions in the likes of [itex]\frac{x}{(1-x^2)}[/itex] or [itex]\frac{x^2}{(1+x)^3}[/itex], which I can solve, but the [itex]3[/itex] in front of the x in [itex]\frac{1}{(3-x)^2}[/itex] is really troubling me, any help? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi aerospacev!

You can factor out the 3 from the denominator and write it as following:
$$f(x)=\frac{(x-1)^2}{9}\frac{1}{(1-x/3)^2}$$
Can you proceed now?
 
I wondered about that, maybe I need to review my basic arithmetic, am I allowed to simply divide each number individually in [itex]{(3-x)^2}[/itex] by 3 and multiply by [itex]3^2[/itex]? Even though the entire term is squared?
 
aerospacev said:
I wondered about that, maybe I need to review my basic arithmetic, am I allowed to simply divide each number individually in [itex]{(3-x)^2}[/itex] by 3 and multiply by [itex]3^2[/itex]? Even though the entire term is squared?

I am not sure what you mean there. What I did is the following:
$$(3-x)^2=\left(3\left(1-\frac{x}{3}\right)\right)^2=3^2\left(1-\frac{x}{3}\right)^2=9\left(1-\frac{x}{3}\right)^2$$
I hope that helps.
 
Last edited:
Pranav-Arora said:
I am not sure what you mean there. What I did is the following:
$$(3-x)^2=\left(3\left(1-\frac{x}{3}\right)\right)^2=3^2\left(1-\frac{x}{3}\right)=9\left(1-\frac{x}{3}\right)$$
I hope that helps.
Hi Panav-Arora.

I think you want to correct those last two versions of the right hand sides, to have an exponent of 2.

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Chestermiller said:
Hi Panav-Arora.

I think you want to correct those last two versions of the right hand sides, to have an exponent of 2.

Chet

Woops, thanks Chet! :D
 
Pranav-Arora said:
I am not sure what you mean there. What I did is the following:
$$(3-x)^2=\left(3\left(1-\frac{x}{3}\right)\right)^2=3^2\left(1-\frac{x}{3}\right)^2=9\left(1-\frac{x}{3}\right)^2$$
I hope that helps.

Oh ok thanks, I think there was just some confusion on my part.

I got the correct answer, thanks again!
 
How about
##f(x) = (\frac{x-1}{3-x})^2 = (\frac{x}{3-x}-\frac{1}{3-x})^2##
## = (\frac{-1}{1-(\frac{3}{x})}-\frac{(\frac{1}{3})}{1-(\frac{x}{3})})^2 ##
##so, f(x) = [-\sum\limits_{n=0}^∞ (\frac{3}{x})^n - \frac{1}{3}\sum\limits_{n=0}^∞ (\frac{x}{3})^n]^2 ## where ##-3 < x < 3##
 
Last edited:
vanceEE said:
How about
##f(x) = (\frac{x-1}{3-x})^2 = (\frac{x}{3-x}-\frac{1}{3-x})^2##
## = (\frac{-1}{1-(\frac{3}{x})}-\frac{(\frac{1}{3})}{1-(\frac{x}{3})})^2 ##
##so, f(x) = [-\sum\limits_{n=0}^∞ (\frac{3}{x})^n - \frac{1}{3}\sum\limits_{n=0}^∞ (\frac{x}{3})^n]^2 ## where ##-3 < x < 3##

I don't think so, wouldn't you then have to divide by zero?
 
Also, even if the calculation is correct,
$$[-\sum\limits_{n=0}^∞ (\frac{3}{x})^n - \frac{1}{3}\sum\limits_{n=0}^∞ (\frac{x}{3})^n]^2$$
is not a power series as written. It is a expression involving power series, but that's not the same thing.
 
aerospacev said:
I don't think so, wouldn't you then have to divide by zero?
Divide what by zero? The index of summation n = 0 means that we would first have a zero as an exponent. This series isn't convergent, an error on my part, but there is nothing being divided by zero in this series; x ≠ 0.