MHB Finding Angle at $\gamma$ - Help Requested

  • Thread starter Thread starter Carla1985
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle
Carla1985
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
View attachment 6256
Hi,

could someone please tell me what theorem I need to be looking at to work out the angle at $\gamma$ please? I've worked out the rest but can't find a theorem for this one.

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • General - 20161101_20115 p.m. - 10.png
    General - 20161101_20115 p.m. - 10.png
    26.7 KB · Views: 80
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Use the vertical angles theorem.
 
Euge said:
Use the vertical angles theorem.

Thanks but that just gives me the angle between the two straight lines. My impression was that $\gamma$ was the part of the angle up to the edge of the circle.
 
That would not make an angle, for an angle is formed by two straight lines. It would only make sense for $gamma$ to be the angle between those two lines.
 
Euge said:
That would not make an angle, for an angle is formed by two straight lines. It would only make sense for $gamma$ to be the angle between those two lines.

That would make things a whole lot easier. Thank you for your help!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top