Finding angle to reduce friction

  • Thread starter Thread starter maff is tuff
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Friction
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the banking angle required for a car traveling around a curve to eliminate frictional forces. The scenario involves a car with a specified speed and curve radius, focusing on concepts from circular motion and forces acting on the vehicle.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between forces acting on the car, including normal force, friction, and centripetal force. Questions arise regarding the validity of assumptions made in the original poster's calculations and the interpretation of force diagrams.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging in clarifying concepts and addressing misunderstandings. Some guidance has been offered regarding the application of forces and the direction of centripetal acceleration, indicating a productive direction in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of confusion regarding notation and terminology, particularly with terms used in different languages. Participants are also questioning the assumptions made about the normal force and its implications for the problem setup.

maff is tuff
Messages
65
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



A car is traveling around a curve that has a radius of 500 ft. at a speed of 60mph. To what angle must the curve be banked so that there is no frictional force?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I have attached mt solution below. I don't know the right answer to this question but I gave it a shot. The answer I got doesn't seem weird or anything so it has a a chance of being right. I don't think I understand the concept completely so I don't know if the moves or assumptions I made are valid. I kind of just wrote down the equations I know that might be relevant and used those. I know circular motion has acceleration proportional to the square of the speed and the radius so I used that equation. I am just not sure if my diagrams are correct and if I'm allowed to set equal the things that I set equal. So could you guys point out what is wrong and give me some hints on how to fix it? Or if it is right can you confirm? Thanks a lot for the help :)
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
4 forces really act in the car. Ff, Fc, P, N.
If we have N=0, we have Ff=0
N=PcosI - FcsenI
P=Fc tanI
so mg = mV²/R tanI
tanI = gR/V²

500ft = 152,4m
60mph = 26,8224 m / s

I>60º
 
I'm sorry you lost me. I have never seen that notation. I know N is normal force. Is Ff forward force? P parallel? And I don't know what Fc is. Why would normal force=0? Sorry I am not following.
 
kkk
That answer I've written in brazilian notation, I'm sorry.
I'm going to translate
Ff would go for friction force, that in BR is Força de atrito
Fc would go for centripetal force that in brazil is Força centrípeta
P would go for weght that in brazil is peso
N is normal

Ff = N.u, if Ff = 0, N is null


John
 
So could you tell me what I did wrong, like at which step I made my first error?
 
The centripetal acceleration is horizontal, not parallel to the ramp, because it points towards the center of the circle that the car traces out.
 
So that means my force diagram is incorrect?
 
The forces you drew were okay, but when you applied F=ma, the resulting equations were wrong because the centripetal acceleration has components in both the x and y directions for your choice of axes.
 
Ok thanks guys I'll work on the problem when I get home and I'll let you know if I have any more problems. Thanks again.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
61
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K