Finding Convex Lens Focal Length

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the focal length of a convex lens using the lens formula and magnification data. The recorded image distances (di) are 6.0, 8.0, 10.0, 12.0, and 14.0, with corresponding magnifications (M) of 0.2, 0.6, 1.0, 1.4, and 1.8. The correct focal length is determined to be 5 cm, derived from the relationship between magnification and image distance. The gradient of the graph plotted between magnification and image distance is confirmed to represent 1/f, clarifying that the object distance (do) is not constant.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the lens formula: 1/di + 1/do = 1/f
  • Knowledge of magnification calculations: M = di/do
  • Ability to plot and interpret graphs in a physics context
  • Familiarity with basic optics concepts related to convex lenses
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the derivation and applications of the lens formula in optics
  • Learn how to graphically determine focal lengths using experimental data
  • Investigate the relationship between object distance, image distance, and magnification in convex lenses
  • Study advanced optics concepts such as ray diagrams and their practical implications
USEFUL FOR

Students studying optics, physics educators, and anyone involved in experimental lens measurements or optical device design.

dh743
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Following data recorded:

Di (distance image to lens) 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0
Magnification 0.2 0.6 1.0 1.4 1.8

Graph magnification against di and use the graph to find the focal length of the lens.



Homework Equations


\frac{1}{di}+\frac{1}{d(object)]}=\frac{1}{f}
M=\frac{di}{do}


The Attempt at a Solution


I worked out that the gradient should be equal to \frac{M}{di}
=\frac{1}{do}

Since the gradient is obviously 0.2, this leaves me with a constant value for do of 5cm, which is in fact the correct answer for the focal length. It doesn't make sense that there would be constant do value, nor does it make sense that this value would be the same as the focal length since no image is formed when object on focal length. Any instruction on manipulating these formulae is much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Th lens formula is
1/di + 1/do = 1/f

1 + di/do = di/f or
1 + M = di/f. or M = di/f - 1
It is in the form
y = mx + c. Here y is M, x is di and m is 1/f.
 
rl.bhat said:
Th lens formula is
1/di + 1/do = 1/f

1 + di/do = di/f or
1 + M = di/f. or M = di/f - 1
It is in the form
y = mx + c. Here y is M, x is di and m is 1/f.

Thanks for the reply. So you've multiplied everything by di, but what does that actually show? As in why would you do it? Also, why isn't the gradient simply 1/do since (di/do)/di = 1/do?
 
You have collected data by keeping the screen at 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 and adjusting the position of the object to get clear image. In that position you have measured the magnification.
so you have drawn the graph of image distance vs magnification.
The gradient is (M1 - M2)/di1 - di2)
The gradient is 1/f, not 1/do. In the problem do is not constant.
To draw the graph, you have to form the relation between M, di and f by using the lens formula.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K