Finding current using Kirchhoff's circuit rules

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around applying Kirchhoff's circuit rules to find the current in a given circuit. Participants are exploring the setup of equations derived from Kirchhoff's loop rule and current law.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss their attempts to formulate equations based on Kirchhoff's rules, noting issues with their systems leading to cancellation. Questions arise regarding the treatment of current directions and the implications of using derived equations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on checking signs and using nodal analysis to relate currents. There is acknowledgment of the challenges faced in determining current directions and the realization of potential errors in the setup of equations.

Contextual Notes

Participants express frustration over the complexity of the problem and the time spent attempting to resolve it. There is mention of the need to clarify assumptions about current directions without prior knowledge of their flow.

slaufer
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Nt0Cm.png



Homework Equations



Kirchhoff's loop rule and (maybe) Kirchhoff's current law

The Attempt at a Solution



So I attempted to apply Kirchhoff's loop rule to the circuit, and ended up with a system of linear equations:

24 - 6I_{1} - 3I_{3} = 0 \rightarrow 2I_{1} - I_{3} = 8
36 - 6I_{1} - 6I_{2} = 0 \rightarrow I_{1} + I_{2} = 6
12 - 3I_{3} - 6I_{2} = 0 \rightarrow 2I_{2} + I_{3} = 4

but every time I try to solve it, I end up with everything dropping out. I'm not sure what I'm missing here, but I've been banging my head against this one for about 4 hours now, so any help would be appreciated!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
slaufer said:

Homework Statement



Nt0Cm.png

Homework Equations



Kirchhoff's loop rule and (maybe) Kirchhoff's current law

The Attempt at a Solution



So I attempted to apply Kirchhoff's loop rule to the circuit, and ended up with a system of linear equations:

24 - 6I_{1} - 3I_{3} = 0 \rightarrow 2I_{1} - I_{3} = 8 wrong
36 - 6I_{1} - 6I_{2} = 0 \rightarrow I_{1} + I_{2} = 6
12 - 3I_{3} - 6I_{2} = 0 wrong\rightarrow 2I_{2} + I_{3} = 4

but every time I try to solve it, I end up with everything dropping out. I'm not sure what I'm missing here, but I've been banging my head against this one for about 4 hours now, so any help would be appreciated!

Check the signs.
You also have a relation between the currents. (Nodal Law) Use that and two loop equations.

ehild
 
Last edited:
Thanks, that makes more sense now.

I might have eventually realized that my system was cancelling out because it was using mutually derived equations, but I probably never would have realized that I was treating I_{3} as if it were flowing in two directions at once.

Using two of the equations from the original system in the nodal rule equation I_{1} = I_{2}+ I_{3} made it all fall together though. I'm still not sure how I'd figure out what direction I_{3} was flowing in if it weren't given in the problem, but at least I'm FINALLY done with this problem.

tl;dr you are the best, thanks
 
You need not find out the direction of the currents in advance. If you have not chosen the proper direction you would get negative value for the current.

ehild
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
883
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K