Finding eigenvectors for a given matrix

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding eigenvectors for a given matrix, specifically the matrix A with elements provided. The original poster has calculated eigenvalues but is struggling to derive the corresponding eigenvectors.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the method for finding eigenvectors, referencing the equation (A - λI)E = 0. Some suggest solving the resulting system of equations, while others question the accuracy of the eigenvalues provided by the original poster.

Discussion Status

There is a mix of guidance offered regarding the method to find eigenvectors, with some participants clarifying the notation and approach. Multiple interpretations of the eigenvalues are being explored, and the discussion remains open without a clear consensus on the correct values or methods.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential discrepancies in the eigenvalues calculated by the original poster, suggesting a possible decimal shift. There is also mention of the need to find the characteristic polynomial to proceed with the eigenvector calculation.

cooltowns
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Finding Eigenvectors of the given matrix


Homework Equations



The matrix is
[itex]A=\begin{pmatrix}<br /> 5.956 & -1.284\\ <br /> -1.284&0.435 <br /> \end{pmatrix}[/itex]


The Attempt at a Solution



I have found the eigenvalues to be

[itex]\lambda _{1}=0.624001[/itex] and [itex]\lambda _{2}=0.150994[/itex]

and

[itex]A-\lambda_{1} I =\begin{pmatrix}<br /> -0.2840 &-1.284 \\ <br /> -1.284 &-5.8050 <br /> \end{pmatrix}[/itex]

[itex]A-\lambda_{2} I =\begin{pmatrix}<br /> 5.8050 &-1.284 \\ <br /> -1.284 &0.2840 <br /> \end{pmatrix}[/itex]

where A is the given matrix, I have rounded up the values slightly.

Using wolfram online I know the eigenvectors I should get are
[itex]E_{1}(-0.9764,0.2161)[/itex] and [itex]E_{2}(-0.2161, 0.9764)[/itex]

However I can't seem to get them.

Could someone please show me how to get those eigenvectors

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To get the eigenvectors of a matrix A use this equation and solve the system of equations for each eigenvector:
[itex](A - \lambda_{\alpha}I)E_{\alpha} = 0[/itex]​
 
Assuming that 0.624001 really is an eigenvalue, then there should be an infinite number of values of x and y such that
[tex]\begin{bmatrix}5.956 & -1.284 \\ -1.284 & 0.435\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}x \\ y\end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix} 0.624001x \\ 0.624001 y\end{bmatrix}[/tex]
which is the same as the pair of equations
5.956x- 1.284y= 0.624001x and -1.284x+ 0.435y= 0.624001y.
Solve either of those for y= ax and take, say, x=1 to get an eigenvector.
 
^It is not
The eigenvalues are approximately 6.24058 and 0.151.
Probably a decimal shift to blame.
 
jncarter said:
To get the eigenvectors of a matrix A use this equation and solve the system of equations for each eigenvector:
[itex](A - \lambda_{\alpha}I)E_{\alpha} = 0[/itex]​

Actually shouldn't that be det(A-λI)? Then he should find the roots of that characteristic polynomial and then proceed to find the bases for the Nullspace of those eigenvalues. Each basis should be the eigenvector for whatever eigenvalue you used.
 
jncarter said:
To get the eigenvectors of a matrix A use this equation and solve the system of equations for each eigenvector:
[itex](A - \lambda_{\alpha}I)E_{\alpha} = 0[/itex]​

SeannyBoi71 said:
Actually shouldn't that be det(A-λI)?
No, what jncarter wrote was correct. The equation above is a matrix equation, and 0 on the right side is a vector.

The equation above implies the equation you show with the determinant. The idea is that if Mx = 0, where M is a square matrix and x is an n-vector, then |M| = 0.
SeannyBoi71 said:
Then he should find the roots of that characteristic polynomial and then proceed to find the bases for the Nullspace of those eigenvalues. Each basis should be the eigenvector for whatever eigenvalue you used.
 
Last edited:
My bad, just never seen that notation before. Learn something new every day, hope I didn't confuse OP. Thanks for clarification.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K