How Can Realistic Physics Improve My Flight Simulator Game Project?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pabloaiz
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Pablo, a 16-year-old game developer, is seeking assistance to enhance the realism of his flight simulator project by implementing accurate physics, particularly for radio-controlled (R/C) planes. He aims to achieve around 100 physics calculations per second to simulate realistic flight patterns. Ken, an experienced R/C flyer, suggests using "Model Aircraft Aerodynamics" by Martin Simmons as a foundational resource and emphasizes the importance of handling continuously changing flight conditions. The discussion highlights the need for proportional control in joystick inputs to improve realism.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic aerodynamics principles relevant to R/C aircraft.
  • Familiarity with physics calculations and their application in game development.
  • Knowledge of joystick input systems and their integration with software.
  • Experience with programming concepts, particularly in real-time simulations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study "Model Aircraft Aerodynamics" by Martin Simmons for foundational knowledge.
  • Research physics engines suitable for flight simulation, such as Bullet Physics or Unity's built-in physics.
  • Explore methods for implementing proportional control in joystick inputs for enhanced realism.
  • Investigate optimization techniques for achieving high FPS in real-time simulations.
USEFUL FOR

Game developers, hobbyists in flight simulation, and anyone interested in enhancing the realism of R/C aircraft simulations through accurate physics modeling.

pabloaiz
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

My name is Pablo and I'm 16. I joined this forum for the sole purpose to help me out with physics for a fun proyect-that I can even show all of you-not school-but a private project.

See, I make games as a hobby. I made a flight simulator. It works 'ok'. But I need realistic physics. So I'm getting rid of all my old work and going to re-start with the help from you guys.

Anyway, if you guys will help me-I'll be able to finish it, and show it to you all to see how it came out.

These should actually be radio-control plane physics-I thought I might mention that. Physics should be the same as full-size plane physiscs, (so don't back out if you don't know about r/c), but the plane might be overpowered and almoust un-stressable. LOL - you R/C flyers, (if there's any of ya), know what I'm talkin' about.

Anyway, can anyone help? I can show what I got so far, but I'm pretty sure I'll have to re-start...

Please do not skip this-I've gone crazy trying to figure this out, if you can help-even in the smallest fashion, please do!

Ok, I though I might show a screenshot to convince ya'all to help me, LOL:

http://www.urge2kill.com/pics/uploads/flightsim5.jpg

PS: Any R/C flyers here? Please help!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi Pabloaiz

I have designed built and flown many RC planes and held 2nd place in standard class, Legue of Silent Flight in Australia.

That's a pretty ambitious project if you don't mind me saying.

One of the problems is that all the aerodynamics texts are going to tell you about conditions of equilibrium. Condition like level flight and constant velocity. Real filght adds enertia and acceleration. Have you thought about how your program is going to handle continually changing flight conditions.

Calculus or itteration?
Itteration is probably going to be the easier method.
Also real and RC aircraft controls are proportional while PC joysticks are either os or off, arn't they?
Is there some way to get a PC to recognise proportional control?
If you can't do that, your programme is not going to be very realistic and it sounds like that is your aim.

There is a very easy to read book "Model aircraft aerodynamics" by Martin Simmons. That is the best starting point I can think of.
Just take notes as you read and make sure you understand each part before moving on. It is not aimed at University level but covers all the major considerations. Try Airbourne Magazine Australia, that is where I got my copy.
 
reply to Ken

Hello Ken!


Good to know you fly R/C!

About the joysticks, most joy sticks actually ARE proportional-but that is not the point. As far as 'controlling' goes- You'll be very glad to hear I have an R/C, 7-channel, proportional radio hooked up to my PC and working wonderfully-and interfaces to hook up your controller would be provided to the people if the simulator is to be sold!

Again, it is great to know you fly R/C planes, and to finally have a reply after 5 days! Thank you! Read on:

The project IS a little ambitious-that is why I'm also doing it with yet, some other R/C flyers and also some advanced coders to help with programming-So,it's basically a team.

Let me explain to you how the program basically works:

As you know, movements you see on your screen (Such as when you move the mouse around), are actually not movements at all but lots of pictures shown many times per second to give the apperance of movement. The number of images, or 'frames' shown each second to give the appearance of movement is known as FPS, which stands for Frames Per Second.

Now, on EACH frame, physics calculations would be done. I'm expecting around 100 calculations per second for a realistic flight patter. Dont be dismayed-this is actually low for computers. I have an old computer and the frame rate is very good on it even with the programming so far-so I imagine on more modern computers the FPS should be well over 60, which is great because the human eye can't tell the difference past 25.

That is how my "program is going to handle continually changing flight conditions."- So basically, my problem is the actual physics. I need many formulas-and the book you tell me about sounds great, but I don't have any $$$. LOL.

So, if you can help me or are interested-let me know. Best way to contact me would be by e-mailing me at: pabloaiz@yahoo.com .

One more thing: Even if you can't help, I'd appreciate some knowledge on what models you like/would liike to have or suggest we have in our flight sim. Maybe details on models, maybe even pictures? If that is alright with you-it would be perfect as I think this will turn out a big proyect.

Thanks again,
Pablo

So, anyone else?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K