MHB Finding $f(67500)$ with Given Conditions on $f(x)$

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conditions
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the value of the function f(67500) given specific conditions on f(x). The function is defined for natural numbers and satisfies the properties f(xy) = f(x) + f(y) - 1, holds the value f(90) = 5, and equals 1 for only finitely many numbers. Participants express enthusiasm and validate each other's attempts at solving the problem. The correct approach to finding f(67500) is acknowledged, highlighting the collaborative nature of the problem-solving process. Overall, the thread emphasizes mathematical exploration and community support in tackling complex functions.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Given that the function $f(x)$ is defined on the set of natural numbers, taking values from the natural numbers, and that it satisfies the following conditions:

(a) $f(xy)=f(x)+f(y)-1$ for any $x,y \in N$.

(b) the equality $f(x)=1$ is true for finitely many numbers.

(c) $f(90) = 5$

Find $f(67500)$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I have edited anemone's post to write $f(90)=5$ instead of $f(90)=6$. I helped her modify this problem from a past Olympiad problem, and I inadvertently gave her the wrong value. My apologies to everyone. (Wasntme)
 
anemone said:
Given that the function $f(x)$ is defined on the set of natural numbers, taking values from the natural numbers, and that it satisfies the following conditions:

(a) $f(xy)=f(x)+f(y)-1$ for any $x,y \in N$.

(b) the equality $f(x)=1$ is true for finitely many numbers.

(c) $f(90) = 5$

Find $f(67500)$.

Let me give it a try.

From (a) we find that $f(90) = f(2\cdot 3^2\cdot 5) = f(2) + 2f(3) + f(5) - 3$.
With (c) this yields:
$$f(2) + 2f(3) + f(5) - 3 = 5$$
$$f(2) + 2f(3) + f(5) = 8\qquad [1]$$

My lemma
Neither f(2), nor f(3), nor f(5) can be 1.
Proof
Suppose one of them is 1, say f(2), then $f(2^k) = kf(2) - k + 1=1$.
That means that infinitely many numbers x have f(x)=1.
This is a contradiction with (b).Combining my lemma with [1] tells us that $f(2)=f(3)=f(5)=2$.

It follows from (a) that:
$f(67500)=f(2^2\cdot 3^3\cdot 5^4)=2f(2)+3f(3)+4f(5) - 8=2\cdot 2 + 3\cdot 2 + 4\cdot 2 - 8 = 10. \qquad \blacksquare$
 
I like Serena said:
Let me give it a try.

From (a) we find that $f(90) = f(2\cdot 3^2\cdot 5) = f(2) + 2f(3) + f(5) - 3$.
With (c) this yields:
$$f(2) + 2f(3) + f(5) - 3 = 5$$
$$f(2) + 2f(3) + f(5) = 8\qquad [1]$$

My lemma
Neither f(2), nor f(3), nor f(5) can be 1.
Proof
Suppose one of them is 1, say f(2), then $f(2^k) = kf(2) - k + 1=1$.
That means that infinitely many numbers x have f(x)=1.
This is a contradiction with (b).Combining my lemma with [1] tells us that $f(2)=f(3)=f(5)=2$.

It follows from (a) that:
$f(67500)=f(2^2\cdot 3^3\cdot 5^4)=2f(2)+3f(3)+4f(5) - 8=2\cdot 2 + 3\cdot 2 + 4\cdot 2 - 8 = 10. \qquad \blacksquare$
Clever!

-Dan
 
I like Serena said:
Let me give it a try.

From (a) we find that $f(90) = f(2\cdot 3^2\cdot 5) = f(2) + 2f(3) + f(5) - 3$.
With (c) this yields:
$$f(2) + 2f(3) + f(5) - 3 = 5$$
$$f(2) + 2f(3) + f(5) = 8\qquad [1]$$

My lemma
Neither f(2), nor f(3), nor f(5) can be 1.
Proof
Suppose one of them is 1, say f(2), then $f(2^k) = kf(2) - k + 1=1$.
That means that infinitely many numbers x have f(x)=1.
This is a contradiction with (b).Combining my lemma with [1] tells us that $f(2)=f(3)=f(5)=2$.

It follows from (a) that:
$f(67500)=f(2^2\cdot 3^3\cdot 5^4)=2f(2)+3f(3)+4f(5) - 8=2\cdot 2 + 3\cdot 2 + 4\cdot 2 - 8 = 10. \qquad \blacksquare$

Thank you for participating, I like Serena! And your answer is correct!:cool:

topsquark said:
Clever!

-Dan

Indeed!(Star)(Star)(Star)
 
I have been insisting to my statistics students that for probabilities, the rule is the number of significant figures is the number of digits past the leading zeros or leading nines. For example to give 4 significant figures for a probability: 0.000001234 and 0.99999991234 are the correct number of decimal places. That way the complementary probability can also be given to the same significant figures ( 0.999998766 and 0.00000008766 respectively). More generally if you have a value that...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
942
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K