MHB Finding $f(67500)$ with Given Conditions on $f(x)$

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conditions
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the value of the function f(67500) given specific conditions on f(x). The function is defined for natural numbers and satisfies the properties f(xy) = f(x) + f(y) - 1, holds the value f(90) = 5, and equals 1 for only finitely many numbers. Participants express enthusiasm and validate each other's attempts at solving the problem. The correct approach to finding f(67500) is acknowledged, highlighting the collaborative nature of the problem-solving process. Overall, the thread emphasizes mathematical exploration and community support in tackling complex functions.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Given that the function $f(x)$ is defined on the set of natural numbers, taking values from the natural numbers, and that it satisfies the following conditions:

(a) $f(xy)=f(x)+f(y)-1$ for any $x,y \in N$.

(b) the equality $f(x)=1$ is true for finitely many numbers.

(c) $f(90) = 5$

Find $f(67500)$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I have edited anemone's post to write $f(90)=5$ instead of $f(90)=6$. I helped her modify this problem from a past Olympiad problem, and I inadvertently gave her the wrong value. My apologies to everyone. (Wasntme)
 
anemone said:
Given that the function $f(x)$ is defined on the set of natural numbers, taking values from the natural numbers, and that it satisfies the following conditions:

(a) $f(xy)=f(x)+f(y)-1$ for any $x,y \in N$.

(b) the equality $f(x)=1$ is true for finitely many numbers.

(c) $f(90) = 5$

Find $f(67500)$.

Let me give it a try.

From (a) we find that $f(90) = f(2\cdot 3^2\cdot 5) = f(2) + 2f(3) + f(5) - 3$.
With (c) this yields:
$$f(2) + 2f(3) + f(5) - 3 = 5$$
$$f(2) + 2f(3) + f(5) = 8\qquad [1]$$

My lemma
Neither f(2), nor f(3), nor f(5) can be 1.
Proof
Suppose one of them is 1, say f(2), then $f(2^k) = kf(2) - k + 1=1$.
That means that infinitely many numbers x have f(x)=1.
This is a contradiction with (b).Combining my lemma with [1] tells us that $f(2)=f(3)=f(5)=2$.

It follows from (a) that:
$f(67500)=f(2^2\cdot 3^3\cdot 5^4)=2f(2)+3f(3)+4f(5) - 8=2\cdot 2 + 3\cdot 2 + 4\cdot 2 - 8 = 10. \qquad \blacksquare$
 
I like Serena said:
Let me give it a try.

From (a) we find that $f(90) = f(2\cdot 3^2\cdot 5) = f(2) + 2f(3) + f(5) - 3$.
With (c) this yields:
$$f(2) + 2f(3) + f(5) - 3 = 5$$
$$f(2) + 2f(3) + f(5) = 8\qquad [1]$$

My lemma
Neither f(2), nor f(3), nor f(5) can be 1.
Proof
Suppose one of them is 1, say f(2), then $f(2^k) = kf(2) - k + 1=1$.
That means that infinitely many numbers x have f(x)=1.
This is a contradiction with (b).Combining my lemma with [1] tells us that $f(2)=f(3)=f(5)=2$.

It follows from (a) that:
$f(67500)=f(2^2\cdot 3^3\cdot 5^4)=2f(2)+3f(3)+4f(5) - 8=2\cdot 2 + 3\cdot 2 + 4\cdot 2 - 8 = 10. \qquad \blacksquare$
Clever!

-Dan
 
I like Serena said:
Let me give it a try.

From (a) we find that $f(90) = f(2\cdot 3^2\cdot 5) = f(2) + 2f(3) + f(5) - 3$.
With (c) this yields:
$$f(2) + 2f(3) + f(5) - 3 = 5$$
$$f(2) + 2f(3) + f(5) = 8\qquad [1]$$

My lemma
Neither f(2), nor f(3), nor f(5) can be 1.
Proof
Suppose one of them is 1, say f(2), then $f(2^k) = kf(2) - k + 1=1$.
That means that infinitely many numbers x have f(x)=1.
This is a contradiction with (b).Combining my lemma with [1] tells us that $f(2)=f(3)=f(5)=2$.

It follows from (a) that:
$f(67500)=f(2^2\cdot 3^3\cdot 5^4)=2f(2)+3f(3)+4f(5) - 8=2\cdot 2 + 3\cdot 2 + 4\cdot 2 - 8 = 10. \qquad \blacksquare$

Thank you for participating, I like Serena! And your answer is correct!:cool:

topsquark said:
Clever!

-Dan

Indeed!(Star)(Star)(Star)
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top