MHB Finding for X given half-angle formulas

  • Thread starter Thread starter bsmithysmith
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formulas
AI Thread Summary
Given that csc(x) = 4, it follows that sin(x) = 1/4 for the interval 90º < x < 180º. Using the Pythagorean identity, cos(x) is determined to be -√(15)/4, as cosine is negative in the second quadrant. The half-angle formulas can then be applied to find sin(x/2), cos(x/2), and tan(x/2). Since sin(x/2) will be positive and cos(x/2) negative, the tangent value will also be negative. This process emphasizes understanding the relationships between the trigonometric functions rather than merely applying formulas.
bsmithysmith
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
If $$csc(x)=4$$, for $$90º<x<180º$$
$$sin\left(\frac{x}{2}\right)=$$
$$cos\left(\frac{x}{2}\right)=$$
$$tan\left(\frac{x}{2}\right)=$$

I'm definitely stumped on this one. I know that this is the half-angle formulas. Luckily we all have sheets we can use for the exam. I know that:

$$csc(x)=4$$ is the same as $$sin(x)=1/4$$, am I correct?

From there, I don't know if I should do a sine inverse, or plug and chug for the half-angle formulas.

$$sin\left(\frac{x}{2}\right)=±√(\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)(1-Cos(2x)))$$

And I don't know if I have to plug for x on both sides, or if I have to find what cosine(2x) is, or If I have to plug in the double angle formula at the end there.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, you are right:

$$\csc(x)=4\implies \sin(x)=\frac{1}{4}$$

Now, looking at the half-angle identities for sine, cosine, and tangent, we see we need to know $\cos(x)$ as well. So, we can use the Pythagorean identity:

$$\cos^2(x)=1-\sin^2(x)=1-\left(\frac{1}{4}\right)^2=\frac{15}{16}$$

Now, when we take the square root of both sides to get $\cos(x)$, which sign should we take on the right, given the quadrant in which $x$ is said to be?
 
MarkFL said:
Yes, you are right:

$$\csc(x)=4\implies \sin(x)=\frac{1}{4}$$

Now, looking at the half-angle identities for sine, cosine, and tangent, we see we need to know $\cos(x)$ as well. So, we can use the Pythagorean identity:

$$\cos^2(x)=1-\sin^2(x)=1-\left(\frac{1}{4}\right)^2=\frac{15}{16}$$

Now, when we take the square root of both sides to get $\cos(x)$, which sign should we take on the right, given the quadrant in which $x$ is said to be?

Since it's at quadrant 2, all cosine values will be negative, and sine values will be positive. I suspect it'll be the same thing for the sine value, but what about the tangent value? I have the cheat sheet available, but I'd still rather understand the process than plug and chug.
 
Yes, cosine is negative in the second quadrant, so since:

$$\cos^2(x)=\frac{15}{16}$$

we must therefore conclude that:

$$\cos(x)=-\frac{\sqrt{15}}{4}$$

So, now you have all you need to find the half-angled values of the primary trig. functions, using the various half-angle identities. If sine is positive, and cosine is negative, and given:

$$\tan(\theta)\equiv\frac{\sin(\theta)}{\cos(\theta)}$$

then what sign would you expect for the tangent function to have?
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Back
Top