Finding frequency of microwaves

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the frequency of microwaves based on observed positions of constructive interference and the behavior of standing waves in a medium, specifically water. Participants are exploring the relationship between the positions of maxima and the implications of standing wave patterns.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the positions of maxima and their calculations of fringe separation, questioning the validity of their assumptions about constructive interference. Some participants suggest that the observed pattern may be due to standing waves rather than traditional interference patterns. There is also a discussion about the relationship between antinodes and dry spots in the context of microwave heating.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants offering insights into the nature of standing waves and their implications for the problem at hand. Some guidance has been provided regarding the visualization of the problem and the relevant equations, but no consensus has been reached on the interpretation of the data or the approach to solving the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the visualization of the problem and the application of relevant equations. There is mention of the need for a clearer understanding of the setup and the relationship between the positions of antinodes and the behavior of water molecules in the presence of microwaves.

songoku
Messages
2,509
Reaction score
393
Homework Statement
A strip of wet cardboard is fixed on the bottom of a microwave oven. The microwave oven is turned on for a short time. When the card is removed a pattern of dry spots is observed on the cardboard. This is because a standing wave is set up inside the oven. The dry spots are measured and found to occur at 14 mm, 86 mm, 156 mm, 225 mm and 293 mm from the end of the strip.
What is the frequency of the microwaves?
Relevant Equations
d sin θ = n.λ

fringe separation = λ L / d
I thought 14 mm, 86 mm, 156 mm, 225 mm and 293 mm are the position where constructive interference happens 14 mm is the position of 1st maxima, 86 mm is the position of 2nd maxima and etc (measured from a certain position of center maxima)

But when I used that numbers to calculate the fringe separation, I got different results:
86 -14 = 72 mm
156 - 86 = 70 mm
225 - 156 = 69 mm
293 - 225 = 68 mm

So I think I am wrong, those numbers are not the position of constructive interference.

How to approach this question? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

You mention fringes, but I suspect (well, the problem statement explicitly says it) the pattern is a consequence of standing waves: different relevant equation.

I don't understand your "I got different results" when the variance is so small: the dry spots are at very regular intervals indeed !

1626167517712.png


##\ ##​
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
BvU said:
Hi,

You mention fringes, but I suspect (well, the problem statement explicitly says it) the pattern is a consequence of standing waves: different relevant equation.

I don't understand your "I got different results" when the variance is so small: the dry spots are at very regular intervals indeed !

Is it correct to think the dry spot as the antinode of a standing wave? Maybe because at antinode the displacement will be maximum so water molecule will be moved away from that spot, leaving dry spot.

Thanks
 
Any reason for this apparent doubt ?

##\ ##
 
songoku said:
so water molecule will be moved away from that spot
Yes, into the air!
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman, songoku and Delta2
songoku said:
Is it correct to think the dry spot as the antinode of a standing wave? Maybe because at antinode the displacement will be maximum so water molecule will be moved away from that spot, leaving dry spot.

Thanks
It is a standing electromagnetic (micro) wave that meets water molecules. The way water molecules interact with electromagnetic waves in the microwave frequency is that they absorb energy from the wave which is converted to heat, the water is heated and it might evaporate if the heat is too strong at that point. The dry spots are because the water has been evaporated by the electromagnetic standing wave and this happens at the points where the standing wave is the strongest, that is at antinodes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
BvU said:
Any reason for this apparent doubt ?

##\ ##
That is because I am not sure how to visualize the question. After you said I should use different relevant equation, I thought about using path difference = n.λ for constructive interference but since I do not know how to visualize the question, I do not know the location of the source of the stationary wave to determine the path difference. Basically my doubt arises because my basic is not strong. I am even surprised the antinode thing crossed my mind.

Thank you very much for the help and explanation BvU, haruspex and Delta2
 
If I tell you that you had a standing wave in a rope and the antinodes are approximately every 70mm how would you find the frequency of the standing wave
 
Delta2 said:
If I tell you that you had a standing wave in a rope and the antinodes are approximately every 70mm how would you find the frequency of the standing wave
With difficulty. But the wavelength is easy !

:smile:

##\ ##
 
  • #10
BvU said:
With difficulty.
Even if I tell you the speed of the waves in the rope?
 
  • #11
Delta2 said:
If I tell you that you had a standing wave in a rope and the antinodes are approximately every 70mm how would you find the frequency of the standing wave
I know how to solve the question now. Find the wavelength based on the distance between two adjacent antinodes then find the frequency using the speed of microwaves
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rsk, Delta2 and BvU
  • #12
songoku said:
Find the wavelength based on the distance between two adjacent antinodes
Just to check, how many wavelengths apart are two adjacent antinodes in a standing wave? :smile:
 
  • #13
berkeman said:
Just to check, how many wavelengths apart are two adjacent antinodes in a standing wave? :smile:
half wavelength :smile:
 
  • Love
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2 and berkeman
  • #14
Thank you very much BvU, haruspex, Delta2 and berkeman
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman, BvU and Delta2
  • #15
We do this experiment every year in class, except with a bar of chocolate instead of the damp card, and we bill it as measuring the speed of light. The chocolate melts at the position of the antinodes and we measure the gaps between these.

As above, the difference in the gaps is too small to be significant. Between 14mm and 293mm there are 5 antinodes or 4 antinode-antinode gaps. So you can find what this gap is on average, then calculate the wavelength of the microwaves from that. We use that with the frequency on the plate on the back of the microwave to find the speed of the waves.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku, Delta2 and berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K