MHB Finding galois group of Fq(x^(1/(q-1))) over Fq(x)

  • Thread starter Thread starter oblixps
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group
oblixps
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
i am trying to find G(F_{q}(x^{\frac{1}{q - 1}}/F_{q}(x)) where q is the power of some prime.

i know that F_{q}(x^{\frac{1}{q - 1}}) is an extension of F_{q}(x) so i need to find the irreducible polynomial of x^{\frac{1}{q - 1}} over F_{q}(x).

i found this to be t^{q - 1} - x which is irreducible over F_{q}[x] by Eisenstein's criterion. i know that every automorphism in the galois group must map roots of polynomials to roots of the same polynomial but i am having trouble finding the roots of t^{q - 1} - x. besides x^{\frac{1}{q - 1}}, I am not sure what other roots it could have. can someone give me some hints on this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
suppose a is a non-zero element of Fq. since the non-zero elements of Fq form a finite cyclic group, we have:

aq-1 = 1, for all such a. thus the other q-2 roots are of the form ax1/(q-1) for a in Fq- {0,1}.

this shows that Fq(x1/(q-1)) is galois over Fq(x).

consequently, if b is a generator of Fq*, then any automorphism of Fq(x1/(q-1)) that fixes Fq(x) sends x1/(q-1) to bkx1/(q-1) for some k = 1,2...q-1.

on the other hand, [Fq(x1/(q-1)) :Fq(x)] = q-1, so these q-1 automorphisms must be all of Gal(Fq(x1/(q-1))/F​q(x)).

since the automorphism x1/(q-1) → bx1/(q-1)​ has order q-1, it appears we have a cyclic group of order q-1.
 
Last edited:
thank you! that was a very descriptive answer.
 
Thread 'How to define vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

Replies
48
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K