Finding Gap Between Two Objects on Moving Conveyor

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bri2012
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conveyor Gap
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the gap between two pieces of wood on a moving conveyor belt. Participants explore various formulas and approaches to determine the gap based on the speed of the conveyor and the length of the wood, addressing both theoretical and practical aspects of the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested, Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents an initial calculation for the gap based on product length and conveyor speed but questions its correctness.
  • Another participant points out a potential unit mismatch between feet and inches in the calculations.
  • Timing between the placement of items on the conveyor is discussed as a critical factor affecting the gap.
  • A formula for calculating the gap based on the speed of the conveyor and the time between items is proposed, with variables defined for clarity.
  • One participant introduces a model considering the acceleration of items as they reach conveyor speed, suggesting that this could affect spacing.
  • Multiple calculations are presented, including a negative gap result, prompting further questions about the timing of item placement and the validity of the approach used.
  • Participants express uncertainty about the correct method for determining the timing of item placement and how it relates to the desired gap.
  • One participant seeks to establish a relationship between speed and gap size, indicating a desire for a mathematical framework to express these dependencies.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct method for calculating the gap or the timing of item placement. There are competing views on the importance of timing and the accuracy of the proposed calculations.

Contextual Notes

Some calculations rely on assumptions about the timing of item placement and the speed of the conveyor, which may not be universally applicable. There are unresolved questions regarding unit conversions and the impact of item acceleration on spacing.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in conveyor systems, logistics, or those working with material handling and automation may find the discussion relevant.

Bri2012
Messages
6
Reaction score
2
I am needing to find the gap between two pieces of wood on a conveyor belt. I am new t this and am having trouble knowing what to Google to find the right formulas. I found one answer on here that helped a little, but it was dealing with two conveyors, and I am not sure if I adjusted the formula correctly. I will include what I did as a reference and hopefully someone can let me know if I did this right.

L (product length) = 37 inches
Vx (Upstream Speed) = 145 FPM
G (gap) = ?

Time = 37/145 == .25517
Distance = 145 * .25517 == 45.93101
Gap = 45.93101 - 37 == 8.9 inches

Does this look correct?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It seems that you are mixing feet and inches.

Welcome!
 
Shoot! I did not catch that, thank you! Besides that, am I finding the gap correctly?
 
The speed of your belt is 29 inches per second.
Don’t you need the time between two pieces of wood to be placed on the belt?
 
Timing is important.
For example, if one piece enters the conveyor per each second, pieces would overlap, as 37 inches of length > 29 inches displacement in one second.
For having zero gap, the faster one piece can follow the previous one is 37/29 seconds.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bri2012
Bri2012 said:
I am needing to find the gap between two pieces of wood on a conveyor belt.
The belt travels at a speed of; b inches per second.
An item is dropped onto the belt every; t seconds.
The pitch of the items on the belt is therefore; p = b * t
Each item has a length; x
The gap between items is; g = p - x
So the gap or space between two items is; g = ( b * t ) - x
Rearrange that to get what you need.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bri2012 and Lnewqban
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Bri2012, anorlunda and erobz
How accurate do you need to be? I've worked the belts at UPS. When packages are placed on the belt, they have some finite acceleration (the belt accelerates them to belt speed over a finite distance).

I tried coming up with a linear drag model but I'm not sure.

let:

##w## be the belt speed

##\beta ( \mu, N )## is a generic coefficient for the time being

##v## is velocity of the package

##m## is the mass of the package

I propose something to the effect of:

$$ \beta ( w - v ) = m \dot v$$

Solving that leads to:

$$ v = w \left( 1 - e^{- \beta t }\right)$$

This model seems lacking because the packages technically never reach belt speed. However, if the things entering the belt are different in a predictable way (like parcels are entering the conveyor) this is going to be a factor in the spacing.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bri2012
  • #10
Belt Speed: 29 inches per second
Time in Seconds Item dropped: (InchesPerSecond/length of piece in inches) ---- (29/37) = 0.7838
Pitch: 29 * .7838 = 22.7302
Length: 37 inches
Gap: p - x = -14.2698
Get gap between two: (29 * .7838) - 37 = -14.2698***The last part I am hoping I did correctly is highlighted in red to calculate how often items are being dropped. Does the way I did that give me the time like I believe it does? Erobz, I will look into that further and let you know!

Truly appreciate all the help!
 
  • #11
Bri2012 said:
Belt Speed: 29 inches per second
Time in Seconds Item dropped: (InchesPerSecond/length of piece in inches) ---- (29/37) = 0.7838
Pitch: 29 * .7838 = 22.7302
Length: 37 inches
Gap: p - x = -14.2698
Get gap between two: (29 * .7838) - 37 = -14.2698***The last part I am hoping I did correctly is highlighted in red to calculate how often items are being dropped. Does the way I did that give me the time like I believe it does?Erobz, I will look into that further and let you know!

Truly appreciate all the help!
Something isn’t correct. How often is a new piece entering the belt? The timing is the independent variable here. Or you can calculate the time interval by specifying a gap length? Which do you want?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bri2012
  • #12
How often is a new piece entering the belt? The timing is the independent variable here. Or you can calculate the time interval by specifying a gap length? Which do you want?
Is there a mathematical way to determine the time? I was told that I could take FPM, divide by the length of the wood, and convert to seconds to get the time. But, I agree it is not seeming like the correct approach.

I want to be able to say if the speeds are this, you will need a gap this big, or if the gaps are this big, you will need speeds of at least this. I would like time to be a dependent variable if possible.
 
  • #13
Bri2012 said:
Is there a mathematical way to determine the time? I was told that I could take FPM, divide by the length of the wood, and convert to seconds to get the time. But, I agree it is not seeming like the correct approach.

I want to be able to say if the speeds are this, you will need a gap this big, or if the gaps are this big, you will need speeds of at least this. I would like time to be a dependent variable if possible.
For example:

If a piece comes in every ##t = 2 \rm{s}##, the gap between them ##g## would be:

$$g = 29 \rm{\frac{in}{s}} \cdot 2 \rm{s} - 37 \rm{in} = 21 \rm{in}$$

If you wanted the gap to be ## 36 \rm{in} ## then you have to solve for the time interval:

$$ 36 \rm{in} = 29 \rm{ \frac{in}{s}} \cdot t - 37 \rm{in} \implies t = \frac{36 \rm{in} + 37 \rm{in} }{ 29 \rm{\frac{in}{s}} } \approx 2.5 \rm{s} $$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban and Bri2012
  • #14
Okay, I see. Thanks for taking the time to explain that to me. This is not stuff I normally do but am branching out and appreciate the kindness.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban and erobz

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
886
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 78 ·
3
Replies
78
Views
10K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K