Undergrad Finding Harmonic Relationships Between Frequencies in Experimental Data

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on relating three frequencies, ω1, ω2, and ω3, where ω3 serves as a large envelope and ω1 and ω2 are integer multiples of ω3. The goal is to express ω1 and ω2 as approximately equal, potentially using a decomposition method. An example from guitar string harmonics illustrates how different frequencies can be integer multiples of a fundamental frequency, but not necessarily of each other. To achieve close values for ω1 and ω2, selecting mutually prime integers for their ratios can help maintain distinct frequencies while ensuring they fit within the envelope of ω3. The approach emphasizes the importance of choosing integers that are close together to minimize the difference between ω1 and ω2 while fitting within the constraints of the envelope frequency.
DeathbyGreen
Messages
83
Reaction score
15
I'm trying to relate some different frequencies together in an experiment. Say I have 3 different frequencies, \omega_1,\omega_2, \omega_3. Omega 3 is the large envelope, and the other two must fit inside of it, and so they are integer multiples of each other. Is there some way to express \omega_1, \omega_2 as equal approximately, or at least in terms of the third without having a mess of different constants? I've looked through some harmonic theory without much luck. All I've been able to think is

<br /> \omega_1 = n_1\omega_3\\<br /> \omega_2 = n_2\omega_3\\<br /> \omega_1 = n_3\omega_2\\<br />

And just mix and match from there. What I would like though is for \omega_1\approx.\omega_2, maybe using a decomposition or something.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
DeathbyGreen said:
I'm trying to relate some different frequencies together in an experiment. Say I have 3 different frequencies, \omega_1,\omega_2, \omega_3. Omega 3 is the large envelope, and the other two must fit inside of it, and so they are integer multiples of each other. Is there some way to express \omega_1, \omega_2 as equal approximately, or at least in terms of the third without having a mess of different constants? I've looked through some harmonic theory without much luck. All I've been able to think is

<br /> \omega_1 = n_1\omega_3\\<br /> \omega_2 = n_2\omega_3\\<br /> \omega_1 = n_3\omega_2\\<br />

And just mix and match from there. What I would like though is for \omega_1\approx.\omega_2, maybe using a decomposition or something.
Based on what you wrote, it depends on the frequencies.
As an example, consider the fundamental frequency of a guitar string -- call this ##F = \omega##. One harmonic can be sounded by lightly pressing the middle of the string, at the 12th fret. This tone is an octave above the fundamental tone, with a frequency of ##F_1 = 2\omega##. Another harmonc can be sounded by lightly pressing at the 7th fret, a third of the length of the string -- ##F_2 = 3\omega##.

Although ##F_1## and ##F_2## are integer multiples of the fundamental tone F, the other two tones in my example are not integer multiples of each other.

There's another harmonic that can be sounded -- the one by lightly pressing the fifth fret, a quarter of the string length. This frequency, ##F_3 = 2F_1 = 4\omega##, so here's an example where the frequency of one of the harmonics is an integer multiple of the frequency of another.
 
  • Like
Likes DeathbyGreen
Given an envelope frequency ω3, you know that ω1 and ω2 will be integer multiples of ω3. Assuming ω1 and ω2 must be different frequencies, simply select two close integers, n1 and n2, then make ω1 = n1⋅ω3 and ω2 = n2⋅ω3

If you make sure that the integers n1 and n2 are mutually prime, then the relative phase of ω1 and ω2 will not repeat within the period of the envelope ω3. The obvious way to select n1 and n2 to be close but not equal, would be to pick a prime for n1, then make n2 = n1 ± 1.

The bigger n1 is, the closer ω2 can be to ω1 and the more cycles of ω1 and of ω2 there will be within the period of the ω3 envelope.
 
  • Like
Likes DeathbyGreen
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K