Finding how high up object travels

  • Thread starter Thread starter dman_PL
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on determining how far a block travels up a rough incline after being launched by a spring. Key concepts include the conversion of energy from the spring to kinetic energy and then to potential energy, while also accounting for energy lost to friction. Participants suggest using algebraic representations of the problem, as numerical values are not provided. The importance of recognizing the difference between distance traveled along the slope and vertical height gained is emphasized. Understanding these energy transformations is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
dman_PL
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A block of inertia m is launched up a rough incline by a spring,
as shown in the figure. The coeffiecient of kinetic friction is µk.
The angle of incline is θ, and the spring is parallel to the surface
of the incline. The spring constant is k, and the spring has been
compressed a distance d from its relaxed position. How far up the
incline, from the point of release, does the block travel before it
stops?

Homework Equations


Im thinking of using the potential energy equation


The Attempt at a Solution



Since its asking how far up, i would assume that we need to separate h in the potential energy equation, but this question really threw me off. How am I supposed to start with no numbers really?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dman_PL said:

Homework Statement



A block of inertia m is launched up a rough incline by a spring,
as shown in the figure. The coeffiecient of kinetic friction is µk.
The angle of incline is θ, and the spring is parallel to the surface
of the incline. The spring constant is k, and the spring has been
compressed a distance d from its relaxed position. How far up the
incline, from the point of release, does the block travel before it
stops?

Homework Equations


Im thinking of using the potential energy equation


The Attempt at a Solution



Since its asking how far up, i would assume that we need to separate h in the potential energy equation, but this question really threw me off. How am I supposed to start with no numbers really?

One way to solve the problem is to set up your own, similar, problem with numbers and solve that, then have a careful look at how you used each value, and replace then with the algebra here.

As an overview: in the beginning there is energy stored in the spring.
Upon release, that will convert to kinetic energy as well as a small amount of gravitational Potential Energy [as the spring expands the mass moves slightly higher up the slope] as well as a little bit of mechanical energy being lost [converted mainly to heat] as the mass moves against friction as the spring expands.
Once the mass leaves the spring, the kinetic energy will be converted to even more Potential energy, with some more mechanical energy lost in overcoming friction as it moves.
This second "conversion phase" means you never actually have to calculate the kinetic energy value.
 
It kind of makes sense. When you talk about kinetic energy, I had someone of a similar problem in which it asked to find how high this object jumped, and I think to calculate the answer I used h=-Δk/mg. Is this what I should sort of end up getting as well?
 
dman_PL said:
It kind of makes sense. When you talk about kinetic energy, I had someone of a similar problem in which it asked to find how high this object jumped, and I think to calculate the answer I used h=-Δk/mg. Is this what I should sort of end up getting as well?

You do use that but have to allow for the energy lost through friction as the mass moves up the slope. The distance it moves along the slope is far greater than the height gained since this is a slope, not a vertical displacement.
 
Alright! ill just keep looking into it, thanks :)
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
9K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K