MHB Finding Mean of a Set of Abstract Numbers

cmkluza
Messages
118
Reaction score
1
Hello, I'm having a little trouble figuring out the following problem:

Consider the set of number a, 2a, 3a, ..., na where a and n are positive integers.

(i) Show that the expression for the mean of this set is \frac{a(n+1)}{2}.

So far the only work I've been able to muster up is:

Mean = \frac{a+2a+3a+...+na}{n} = \frac{a(1+2+3+...+n)}{n} = a(\frac{1+2+3+...}{n}+1) = \frac{a+2a+3a+...}{n}+a

I'm not sure what to do with the indefinitely large sum of numbers that are involved with a in this problem, and I'm not really sure how to configure the problem into the simplified expression for mean shown in the problem.

Any help will be greatly appreciated, thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Read about arithmetic progression. In this case, it is sufficient to note that $1+\dots+n=(1+n)+(2+(n-1))+\dots$ where in the second sum the number of terms is $n/2$ and each term equals $n+1$. Consider what $n/2$ means more precisely in this context when $n$ is even and when it is odd.
 
Evgeny.Makarov said:
Read about arithmetic progression. In this case, it is sufficient to note that $1+\dots+n=(1+n)+(2+(n-1))+\dots$ where in the second sum the number of terms is $n/2$ and each term equals $n+1$. Consider what $n/2$ means more precisely in this context when $n$ is even and when it is odd.

Thanks a bunch for your help. Sorry I wasn't able to reply in a while, but it makes much more sense now. Thanks again!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top