- 95

- 0

## Main Question or Discussion Point

I have a function that looks like this:

http://rpi.edu/~doriad/view1.jpg [Broken]

The function is non analytic, so I have to use something like the steepest descent method with numerical gradients to find the minimum. However, if my starting point is on the left of the tall peak, the min I find is on the left side (clearly) and if I choose the starting point to be on the right side I find the low point on the right. Clearly in this case I could just do both and take the smaller one, but if I'm not sure about the location of the tall peak to start with, I can't simply choose a starting point on either side. Is there a way to find the actual lowest point consistently?

Thanks,

David

http://rpi.edu/~doriad/view1.jpg [Broken]

The function is non analytic, so I have to use something like the steepest descent method with numerical gradients to find the minimum. However, if my starting point is on the left of the tall peak, the min I find is on the left side (clearly) and if I choose the starting point to be on the right side I find the low point on the right. Clearly in this case I could just do both and take the smaller one, but if I'm not sure about the location of the tall peak to start with, I can't simply choose a starting point on either side. Is there a way to find the actual lowest point consistently?

Thanks,

David

Last edited by a moderator: