Finding moment generating functions

  • Thread starter Thread starter DODGEVIPER13
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions Moment
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
18 replies · 2K views
DODGEVIPER13
Messages
668
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Uploaded


Homework Equations


Uploaded


The Attempt at a Solution


Well I believe it to be Binomial as the probabilities never change. So I used it to solve for the moment generating function, I do howvere want to know if what I have done is correct and also how I went from sigma((Pe^t)^y(n y)q^(n-y)) as the book did this?
 

Attachments

  • EPSON019.jpg
    EPSON019.jpg
    14.6 KB · Views: 459
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok so p should be .50 but does my work look ok other than that and the obvious mathematical error due to that on the second part
 
After the final sigma part like I asked above how do I arrive at the moment generating function like I did?
 
In the third line of part 2, you've written E[Y] = M'(t) by mistake for M'(0).
In the next line, you've left something out when applying the product rule to get M''.
 
DODGEVIPER13 said:
After the final sigma part like I asked above how do I arrive at the moment generating function like I did?
It's just the binomial expansion (run in reverse).
 
Ok a bit lost on what was wrong with m" it looks right to me hmmm where should I look
 
DODGEVIPER13 said:
Ok a bit lost on what was wrong with m" it looks right to me hmmm where should I look
Looks like I need to take a break. You're quite right, and the rest of your work looks good too.
 
Ok so should I change p to .5 and q to .5 and I wind up with 1.5
 
I changed p from .75 to .5 as you said
 
Also for the first part I now have (.50e^t+.50)^2
 
Wait why is p what you said should I not also include the probability that you flip a head and head thus making it .75
 
When you say all good was it all good before or all good now?
 
When you wrote the first two lines of your solution, what were you defining p to be? What do you get if you set n=2 and write out the sum in the second line?
You showed E[Y] = np. If n=2 and p=.75, would you really expect an average of 1.5 heads in two tosses?
 
I was defining p to be the possible heads observed by the 2 flips and to the final question no I would not so I guess what I have changed it to is correct
 
DODGEVIPER13 said:
I was defining p to be the possible heads observed by the 2 flips
But p is a probability, not a number of heads. If you wanted to approach it that way you'd need three probabilities: 0, 1 or 2 heads.
 
Ah ok got it now thanks so the way I have it now is correct
 
DODGEVIPER13 said:
Ah ok got it now thanks so the way I have it now is correct

Yes.