MHB Finding $\overline {AD} \times \overline {CD}$ in $\triangle APB$

  • Thread starter Thread starter Albert1
  • Start date Start date
Albert1
Messages
1,221
Reaction score
0
$\triangle APB, \overline {PA}=\overline {PB}, \angle APB=2\angle ACB, $
point $D$ is the intersection of $\overline {AC}$, and $\overline {BP}$
if $\overline {BP}=3 , \overline {PD}=2$
please find the value of $\overline {AD}\times \overline {CD}$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi Albert. Where is point $C$?
 
Since the problem implies (truthfully) that it does not matter where C or A is located up to the constraints (on circle), I picked AC to be vertical.

View attachment 4989

This depicts one of the Pythagorean Means, specifically the Geometric Mean.
That is to say; Length AD is the GM of DB and 6-DB. AD = SQRT(1*5).

AD=DC so AD*DC = 5
(proof of the implication not being required, makes this a simple problem)
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    6.7 KB · Views: 114
Last edited by a moderator:
RLBrown said:
Since the problem implies (truthfully) that it does not matter where C or A is located up to the constraints (on circle), I picked AC to be vertical.
This depicts one of the Pythagorean Means, specifically the Geometric Mean.
That is to say; Length AD is the GM of DB and 6-DB. AD = SQRT(1*5).

AD=DC so AD*DC = 5
(proof of the implication not being required, makes this a simple problem)
very good solution !
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top