MHB Finding percentage required to break even

  • Thread starter Thread starter tumeke
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Break even
tumeke
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello there,

I have the following set of data

Wins 6
Losses 13
Average Win 14.33%
Average Loss -4.47%

I want to know how to figure out the maximum average loss at which I can still break even. I have tried a few different things but cannot figure it out.

Thanks,
Patrick
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi Patrick and welcome to MHB. :)

What have you tried?
 
tumeke said:
Hello there,

I have the following set of data

Wins 6
Losses 13
Average Win 14.33%
Average Loss -4.47%
What does this mean? "Average Win" is 14.33% of what? "Average Loss" is -4.47% of what?

I want to know how to figure out the maximum average loss at which I can still break even. I have tried a few different things but cannot figure it out.

Thanks,
Patrick
 
Country Boy said:
What does this mean? "Average Win" is 14.33% of what? "Average Loss" is -4.47% of what?

I was hoping for additional clarification from the OP. Thanks for pointing that out.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top