MHB Finding Real Solutions for a System of Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The system of equations has the only solution where each variable \( a_j \) equals 1 for all \( j \) from 1 to 1997. The first equation establishes that the sum of all variables equals 1997, while the second equation relates the cubes and fourth powers of these variables. By manipulating these equations, it is shown that the terms in the derived equation can only sum to zero if each individual term is zero, leading to the conclusion that all \( a_j \) must be equal to 1. This reasoning confirms the uniqueness of the solution. The discussion highlights the elegance of the mathematical approach used to arrive at this conclusion.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Find all solutions in real numbers to the system below:

$a_1+a_2+\cdots+a_{1997}=1997$

$a_1^3+a_2^3+\cdots+a_{1997}^3=a_1^4+a_2^4+\cdots+a_{1997}^4$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
[sp]The only solution is $a_j = 1$ for all $j$ ($1\leqslant j\leqslant 1997$).

Write the equations as $$\sum_{j=1}^{1997}(a_j-1) = 0, \qquad (1)$$ $$\sum_{j=1}^{1997}a_j^3(a_j-1) = 0. \qquad(2)$$ Subtract (1) from (2): $$\sum_{j=1}^{1997}(a_j^3 - 1)(a_j-1) = 0. \qquad(3)$$ In each term of that sum, the numbers $a_j^3 - 1$ and $a_j - 1$ are either both positive, both zero or both negative, depending on whether $a_j \gtrless 1$. So each term is non-negative, and the sum can only be zero if each term is zero. Therefore $a_j = 1$ for all $j$.[/sp]
 
Opalg said:
[sp]The only solution is $a_j = 1$ for all $j$ ($1\leqslant j\leqslant 1997$).

Write the equations as $$\sum_{j=1}^{1997}(a_j-1) = 0, \qquad (1)$$ $$\sum_{j=1}^{1997}a_j^3(a_j-1) = 0. \qquad(2)$$ Subtract (1) from (2): $$\sum_{j=1}^{1997}(a_j^3 - 1)(a_j-1) = 0. \qquad(3)$$ In each term of that sum, the numbers $a_j^3 - 1$ and $a_j - 1$ are either both positive, both zero or both negative, depending on whether $a_j \gtrless 1$. So each term is non-negative, and the sum can only be zero if each term is zero. Therefore $a_j = 1$ for all $j$.[/sp]

Well done Opalg and thanks for participating! Your solution is elegant and compelling!

Here is a solution that is proposed by other:

First, we let $S_n=a_1^n+a_2^n+\cdots+a_{1997}^n$.

By the power mean inequality, we have

$\left( \dfrac{S_4}{1997} \right)^{\dfrac{1}{4}}\ge \dfrac{S_1}{1997}=1$ and

$\left( \dfrac{S_4}{1997} \right)^{\dfrac{1}{4}}\ge \left(\dfrac{S_3}{1997} \right)^{\dfrac{1}{4}}=\left( \dfrac{S_4}{1997} \right)^{\dfrac{1}{3}}$

and so $\dfrac{S_4}{1997}\le 1$ as well.

Thus equality holds in the power mean inequality, which implies $a_1=a_2=\cdots=a_{1997}=1$.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Back
Top